Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21610707›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2011

Predicting the outcome of grade II glioma treated with temozolomide using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

R Guillevin, C Menuel, S Taillibert, L Capelle, R Costalat, L Abud, C Habas, G De Marco, K Hoang-Xuan, J Chiras and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Treatment Response Assessment in IDH-Mutant Glioma Patients by Noninvasive 3D Functional Spectroscopic Mapping of 2-Hydroxyglutarate.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2016
    Article
  10. Magnetic Resonance (MR) Metabolic Imaging in Glioma.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Functional imaging in adult and paediatric brain tumours.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

R GuillevinDepartment of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Sapêtrière Hospital, Functional Imaging Laboratory, INSERM U678, UPMC University Paris 6, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France. remy.guillevin@psl.aphp.fr
C Menuel
S Taillibert
L Capelle
R Costalat
L Abud
C Habas
G De Marco
K Hoang-Xuan
J Chiras
J-N Vallée
Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FRInserm · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité de Picardie Jules Verne · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversité Paris Nanterre · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was designed to evaluate proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) for monitoring the WHO grade II glioma (low-grade glioma (LGG)) treated with temozolomide (TMZ).

methodsThis prospective study included adult patients with progressive LGG that was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Temozolomide was administered at every 28 days. Response to TMZ was evaluated by monthly MRI examinations that included MRI with volumetric calculations and (1)H-MRS for assessing Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA ratios. Univariate, multivariate and receiver-operating characteristic statistical analyses were performed on the results.

resultsA total of 21 LGGs from 31 patients were included in the study, and followed for at least n=14 months during treatment. A total of 18 (86%) patients experienced a decrease in tumour volume with a greater decrease of metabolic ratios. Subsequently, five (28%) of these tumours resumed growth despite the continuation of TMZ administration with an earlier increase of metabolic ratios of 2 months. Three (14%) patients did not show any volume or metabolic change. The evolutions of the metabolic ratios, mean(Cho/Cr)(n) and mean(Cho/NAA)(n), were significantly correlated over time (Spearman ρ=+0.95) and followed a logarithmic regression (P>0.001). The evolutions over time of metabolic ratios, mean(Cho/Cr)(n) and mean(Cho/NAA)(n), were significantly correlated with the evolution of the mean relative decrease of tumour volume, mean(ΔV(n)/V(o)), according to a linear regression (P<0.001) in the 'response/no relapse' patient group, and with the evolution of the mean tumour volume (meanV(n)), according to an exponential regression (P<0.001) in the 'response/relapse' patient group. The mean relative decrease of metabolic ratio, mean(Δ(Cho/Cr)(n)/(Cho/Cr)(o)), at n=3 months was predictive of tumour response over the 14 months of follow-up. The mean relative change between metabolic ratios, mean((Cho/NAA)(n)-(Cho/Cr)(n))/(Cho/NAA)(n), at n=4 months was predictive of tumour relapse with a significant cutoff of 0.046, a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 100% (P=0.004).

conclusionsThe (1)H-MRS profile changes more widely and rapidly than tumour volume during the response and relapse phases, and represents an early predictive factor of outcome over 14 months of follow-up. Thus, (1)H-MRS may be a promising, non-invasive tool for predicting and monitoring the clinical response to TMZ.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAspartic AcidBrain NeoplasmsCholineCreatineDacarbazineFemaleGliomaHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProtonsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAspartic AcidCholineCreatineDacarbazineN-acetylaspartateProtonsTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID21610707
PMCPMC3111204
OpenAlexW2060484108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.