Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21610525›Full record

Trial reportJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2011

Assessment of objective responses using volumetric evaluation in advanced thymic malignancies and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Jeremy Force, Arun Rajan, Eva Dombi, Seth M Steinberg, Giuseppe Giaccone

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Quantitative Imaging Assessment of Tumor Response to Chemoradiation 
in Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of patients with thymic epithelial tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2013
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy ForceMedical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Arun Rajan
Eva Dombi
Seth M Steinberg
Giuseppe Giaccone
Maryland Oncology Hematology · USCenter for Cancer Research · US

Funding

Office of Collaborative BiostatisticsZIDSC007202 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOO-WOSOBA, HYOYOUNG · 2009 to 2025
$14.5M
Thorarcic Cancer Research LaboratoryZIABC011269 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GIACCONE, GIUSEPPE · 2010 to 2013
$5.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMeasurement of tumor response by standard response criteria is challenging in thymic malignancies, especially when the pleura is involved, as it often is in stage IV disease. In this study, we aimed to determine the effectiveness of volumetric response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (volumetrics) for evaluating response in patients with thymic malignancies treated on a phase II study of belinostat.

methodsWe evaluated the tumor responses of 25 patients with thymic cancer using computed tomography-based RECIST, World Health Organization (WHO), modified RECIST, and volumetrics. As a control, we assessed 37 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with RECIST and volumetrics.

resultsAgreement analyses in 23 patients with thymic cancer at the time of RECIST-determined progressive disease (PD) compared volumetrics with RECIST, modified RECIST, and WHO criteria. Use of volumetrics was associated with 22% discordance compared with RECIST, 15% versus modified RECIST, and 22% versus WHO criteria. Volumetrics revealed PD 72 days earlier than RECIST (p = 0.016). In another cohort of 35 patients with NSCLC, there was 9% discordance between volumetrics and RECIST at the time of PD. Volumetrics demonstrated PD 32 days earlier than RECIST in NSCLC (p = 0.0078).

conclusionsOur study suggests that volumetrics might improve detection of PD. Prospective evaluation of this technique in a larger series of patients with thymic malignancies will be required.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBenzenesulfonatesCarcinoma, Large CellCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydroxamic AcidsLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsbelinostatBenzenesulfonatesHydroxamic AcidsNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesSorafenibSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID21610525
PMCPMC3157582
OpenAlexW1967956772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.