Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21610109›Full record

ArticleCancer research2011

Evolved tumor suppression: why are we so good at not getting cancer?

James DeGregori

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Aging-associated differences in mammary tumor-initiating populations and immune evasion pathways in breast cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Elephant and the Spandrel.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Approaches and methods to study wildlife cancer.The Journal of animal ecology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The Rise of Gastrointestinal Cancers as a Global Phenomenon: Unhealthy Behavior or Progress?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

James DeGregoriDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Program in Molecular Biology, Integrated Department of Immunology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. james.degregori@ucdenver.edu
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Poor competition in hematopoietic stem/progenitor pools favors tumorigenesisR01CA109657 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI DEGREGORI, JAMES V · 2005 to 2009
$1.1M
Diet-Induced Adaptive Leukemogenesis: BCR-Abl dependent upregulation of folate reR21CA137262 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI DEGREGORI, JAMES V · 2009 to 2010
$344k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109657NCI NIH HHS R21 CA137262NCI NIH HHS R21-CA137262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The law of natural selection can be used to understand cancer development at the level of species as well as at the level of cells and tissues. Through this perspective, I seek to explain: (i) Why the lack of sufficient selective pressure to prevent cancers in old age helps explain the exponential increase in cancer incidence in the elderly. (ii) Why the evolution of long-lived animals necessitated the acquisition of potent tumor suppressive mechanisms. (iii) How the requirement to prevent inappropriate somatic cell expansion and cancer has constrained developmental and tissue architectural modalities. (iv) How the evolution of well-adapted stem cells with complex niche requirements has conferred resistance to oncogenic mutations, as phenotype-altering genetic change is almost always disadvantageous within a well-adapted cell population. (v) How the impairment of stem cell fitness, as occurs in old age, can promote selection for adaptive mutations and cancer initiation. (vi) Why differential maintenance of stem cell fitness may explain how different vertebrate species with enormous differences in life span and body size similarly avoid cancer through reproductive years.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticAge FactorsAnimalsHumansNeoplasmsPhenotypeStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID21610109
PMCPMC3677553
OpenAlexW2105401801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.