Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21609436›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2011

Combination therapy with vemurafenib (PLX4032/RG7204) and metformin in melanoma cell lines with distinct driver mutations.

Franziska Niehr, Erika von Euw, Narsis Attar, Deliang Guo, Doug Matsunaga, Hooman Sazegar, Charles Ng, John A Glaspy, Juan A Recio, Roger S Lo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Metabolic Reprogramming in Thyroid Cancer.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Novel Mitochondrial Inhibitor Blocks MAPK Pathway and Overcomes MAPK Inhibitor Resistance in Melanoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Franziska NiehrDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), USA.
Erika von Euw
Narsis Attar
Deliang Guo
Doug Matsunaga
Hooman Sazegar
Charles Ng
John A Glaspy
Juan A Recio
Roger S Lo
Paul S Mischel
Begonya Comin-Anduix
Antoni Ribas
University of California, Los Angeles · USUCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

Augmenting Melanoma Response to B-Raf V600E TargetingK22CA151638 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LO, ROGER S · 2010 to 2012
$561k
NCI NIH HHS K22 CA151638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA molecular linkage between the MAPK and the LKB1-AMPK energy sensor pathways suggests that combined MAPK oncogene inhibition and metabolic modulation of AMPK would be more effective than either manipulation alone in melanoma cell lines. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe combination of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib (formerly PLX4032) and metformin were tested against a panel of human melanoma cell lines with defined BRAF and NRAS mutations for effects on viability, cell cycle and apoptosis. Signaling molecules in the MAPK, PI3K-AKT and LKB1-AMPK pathways were studied by Western blot.

resultsSingle agent metformin inhibited proliferation in 12 out of 19 cell lines irrespective of the BRAF mutation status, but in one NRASQ61K mutant cell line it powerfully stimulated cell growth. Synergistic anti-proliferative effects of the combination of metformin with vemurafenib were observed in 6 out of 11 BRAFV600E mutants, including highly synergistic effects in two BRAFV600E mutant melanoma cell lines. Antagonistic effects were noted in some cell lines, in particular in BRAFV600E mutant cell lines resistant to single agent vemurafenib. Seven out of 8 BRAF wild type cell lines showed marginally synergistic anti-proliferative effects with the combination, and one cell line had highly antagonistic effects with the combination. The differential effects were not dependent on the sensitivity to each drug alone, effects on cell cycle or signaling pathways.

conclusionsThe combination of vemurafenib and metformin tended to have stronger anti-proliferative effects on BRAFV600E mutant cell lines. However, determinants of vemurafenib and metformin synergism or antagonism need to be understood with greater detail before any potential clinical utility of this combination.

Indexed as

ApoptosisBlotting, WesternCell CycleCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCulture MediaDNA Mutational AnalysisDrug SynergismFlow CytometryGlucoseHumansIndolesMelanomaMetforminMutationBRAF protein, humanCulture MediaGlucoseIndolesMetforminPhosphothreonineProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktSulfonamidesVemurafenib

Identifiers

PMID21609436
PMCPMC3152784
OpenAlexW2102686544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.