Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21607985›Full record

ReviewMuscle & nerve2011

Therapeutics development in myotonic dystrophy type 1.

Erin Pennock Foff, Mani S Mahadevan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Muscle & nerve, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Resveratrol corrects aberrant splicing ofNeural regeneration research · 2020
    Article
  4. Responsiveness of outcome measures in myotonic dystrophy type 1.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Increased Muscleblind levels by chloroquine treatment improve myotonic dystrophy type 1 phenotypes in in vitro and in vivo models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antisense therapy in neurology.Journal of personalized medicine · 2013
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erin Pennock FoffDepartment of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Mani S Mahadevan
University of Virginia · US

Funding

MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF THE MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY MUTATIONR01AR045992 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI MAHADEVAN, MANI SUBRAMANIAM · 1999 to 2013
$2.8M
Role of FN14 in RNA ToxicityR01AR062189 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI MAHADEVAN, MANI SUBRAMANIAM · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Inducible Transgenic Mouse Model of RNA ToxicityR01AR052771 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI MAHADEVAN, MANI SUBRAMANIAM · 2005 to 2009
$1.6M
NINDS Research Education Program for Residents and Fellows at the University of VR25NS065733 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI JOHNSTON, KAREN C., KAPUR, JAIDEEP · 2009 to 2013
$172k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR045992NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR045992NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR052771NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR052771NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR062189NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS065733NINDS NIH HHS R25NS065733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myotonic dystrophy (DM1), the most common adult muscular dystrophy, is a multisystem, autosomal dominant genetic disorder caused by an expanded CTG repeat that leads to nuclear retention of a mutant RNA and subsequent RNA toxicity. Significant insights into the molecular mechanisms of RNA toxicity have led to the previously unforeseen possibility that treating DM1 is a viable prospect. In this review, we briefly present the clinical picture in DM1, and describe how the research in understanding the pathogenesis of RNA toxicity in DM1 has led to targeted approaches to therapeutic development at various steps in the pathogenesis of the disease. We discuss the promise and current limitations of each with an emphasis on RNA-based therapeutics and small molecules. We conclude with a discussion of the unmet need for clinical tools and outcome measures that are essential prerequisites to proceed in evaluating these potential therapies in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyRNAHumansMyotonic DystrophyOligonucleotides, AntisenseOligonucleotides, AntisenseRNA

Identifiers

PMID21607985
PMCPMC3136655
OpenAlexW2122522202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.