ArticleDer Nervenarzt2012
[Responsible dealing with sexuality. Recommendations in a clinical institution].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regulation of Sexual Behavior and Health in German Prisons and Forensic Psychiatric Hospitals.Behavioral sciences & the lawArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexuality is excluded in house regulations, guidelines, instructions and regulations in German hospitals. The English literature does not show much more, but more often the wish for clear guidelines is formulated. Under the guidance of the clinical Ethics Committee a paper with recommendations was prepared, which comprises regulations for responsible handling of sexuality in the Pfalzklinikum. This includes sexuality of acute patients in psychiatry, nursing home inhabitants, forensic patients and above all patients in the department of child and youth psychiatry. The right of self-realization on the one hand, the staff's responsibility for patients with limitations in the determination of one's intent on the other hand and the rules for staff members define the range of the paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21607802What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.