Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21607612›Full record

ReviewReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2012

Location, location, location: genetic regulation of neural sex differences.

Jean LeBeau Abel, Emilie F Rissman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Genetic regulation of sex differences in songbirds and lizards.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Cell-autonomous sex determination outside of the gonad.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jean LeBeau AbelDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, PO Box 800733, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. jma6n@virginia.edu
Emilie F Rissman
University of Virginia · US

Funding

GENETIC AND NEUROENDOCRINE CONTROL OF BEHAVIORAL SYSTEMSR01MH057759 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI RISSMAN, EMILIE F. · 1999 to 2013
$4.0M
Sex chromosome effects on neural and behavioral differentiationR01NS055218 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI RISSMAN, EMILIE F. · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH057759NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055218NINDS NIH HHS R01NS055218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex differences in many behaviors such as cognition, mood, and motor skills are well-documented in animals and humans and are regulated by many neural circuits. Sexual dimorphisms within cell populations in these circuits play critical roles in the production of these behavioral dichotomies. Here we focus on three proteins that have well described sexual dimorphisms; calbindin-D28k, a calcium binding protein, tyrosine hydroxylase, the rate limiting enzyme involved in dopamine synthesis and vasopressin, a neuropeptide with central and peripheral sites of action. We describe the sex differences in subpopulations of these proteins, with particular emphasis on laboratory mice. Our thrust is to examine genetic bases of sex differences and how the use of genetically modified models has advanced our understanding of this topic. Regional sex differences in the expression of these three proteins are driven by sex chromosome complement, steroid receptors or in some instances both. While studies of sex differences attributable to sex chromosome genes are still few in number it is exciting to note that this variable factors into expression differences for all three of these proteins. Different genetic mechanisms, which elaborate sex differences, may be employed stochastically in different cell populations. Alternately, general patterns involving the timing of differentiation of the sex differences, relative to the "critical period" in hormonal differences between males and female neonates may emerge. In conclusion, future directions in this area should include examination of the importance of location, timing, steroidal receptor/sex chromosome gene synergy and epigenetics in molding neural sex differences.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnimalsArginine VasopressinCalbindin 1CalbindinsEpigenesis, GeneticEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleHumansMaleMiceMidline Thalamic NucleiPreoptic AreaRatsReceptors, SteroidS100 Calcium Binding Protein GArginine VasopressinCALB1 protein, humanCalb1 protein, mouseCalb1 protein, ratCalbindin 1CalbindinsEstrogen Receptor alphaReceptors, SteroidS100 Calcium Binding Protein GTyrosine 3-MonooxygenaseVasopressins

Identifiers

PMID21607612
PMCPMC3622700
OpenAlexW1982413155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.