Trial reportClinical rheumatology2011
A 13-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of lumiracoxib in hip osteoarthritis.
Trial report in Clinical rheumatology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cardiovascular safety of celecoxib in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Safety of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors in Osteoarthritis: Outcomes of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Drugs & aging · 2019Pooled it
- Efficacy of commonly prescribed analgesics in the management of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Rheumatology international · 2018Pooled it
- Celecoxib for osteoarthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib Therapy in Osteoarthritis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Medicine · 2016Pooled it
- The efficacy of duloxetine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids in osteoarthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2014Pooled it
- Renal effects of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor anti-inflammatory drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Review
- Comparison between 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- A new treatment for hip osteoarthritis: clinical evidence for the efficacy of autologous conditioned serum.Orthopedic reviews · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this 13-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and positive-internal (celecoxib)-controlled, parallel-group study was to demonstrate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lumiracoxib in primary hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Eligible patients (n = 1,262; ACR criteria) were randomized (1:1:1) to receive lumiracoxib 100 mg once daily (o.d.) (n = 427), celecoxib 200 mg o.d. (n = 419), or matching placebo o.d. (n = 416) administered orally. The primary objective was to compare lumiracoxib 100 mg o.d. and placebo with respect to three co-primary efficacy variables: the pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Likert version 3.1 (WOMAC™ LK 3.1) questionnaire, the function subscale of the WOMAC™ LK 3.1 questionnaire, and patient's global assessment of disease activity (100-mm visual analog scale (VAS)) after 13 weeks of treatment. Of the 1,262 randomized patients, 951 completed the study. All randomized patients were included in the intention-to-treat and safety populations. Lumiracoxib was superior to the placebo (p < 0.001) after 13 weeks for all three co-primary endpoints. By week 13, the patient's global assessment of disease activity (100-mm VAS) improved by 23.3 mm (±SD, 27.83 mm) with lumiracoxib and 13.3 mm (±26.71 mm) with placebo. The WOMAC™ function score decreased by 10.4 (±13.56) with lumiracoxib and 6.8 (±12.55) with placebo. The WOMAC™ pain scores decreased by 3.4 (±4.16) with lumiracoxib and 2.2 (±3.94) with placebo at week 13. Similar results were observed for secondary endpoints: OA pain intensity and WOMAC™ total score. Lumiracoxib was similar to celecoxib for all three co-primary endpoints. All treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, lumiracoxib is effective in reducing pain and improving function in hip OA patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21607551What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.