Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21605648›Full record

ReviewHearing research2011

Cochlear infrastructure for electrical hearing.

Bryan E Pfingst, Sara A Bowling, Deborah J Colesa, Soha N Garadat, Yehoash Raphael, Seiji B Shibata, Stefan B Strahl, Gina L Su, Ning Zhou

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hearing research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06375278 (Device to Deliver Intra-Operative Therapeutic Hypothermia for Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06375278 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Device to Deliver Intra-Operative Therapeutic Hypothermia for Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation

TypeinterventionalSponsorRestorear Devices LLCRan2024 to 2027Enrolled54ConditionsCochlear Implants, Cochlear Implantation, Hearing LossArmsIntra-Ear Canal Cooling Catheter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cochlear Health and Cochlear-implant Function.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Psychophysical Tuning Curves as a Correlate of Electrode Position in Cochlear Implant Listeners.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Emerging Gene Therapies for Genetic Hearing Loss.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Bryan E PfingstDepartment of Otolaryngology, Kresge Hearing Research Institute, University of Michigan, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5616, USA. bpfingst@umich.edu
Sara A Bowling
Deborah J Colesa
Soha N Garadat
Yehoash Raphael
Seiji B Shibata
Stefan B Strahl
Gina L Su
Ning Zhou
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Scientific Synergy CoreP30DC005188 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALTSCHULER, RICHARD A · 2002 to 2016
$10.3M
Sensory Mechanisms and Disorders - Administrative SupplementT32DC000011 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Michael Thomas Roberts · 1989 to 2026
$9.5M
CORTICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESPONSES TO COCHLEAR IMPLANTSR01DC004312 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MIDDLEBROOKS, JOHN C · 2000 to 2010
$2.5M
Cochlear Implants in Reinnervated EarsR01DC010412 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI RAPHAEL, YEHOASH · 2010 to 2014
$2.2M
Across-Site Patterns of Perception with Cochlear ImplantsR01DC010786 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PFINGST, BRYAN E · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Acoustic and electrical hearing after Atoh1 treatmentR01DC007634 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PFINGST, BRYAN E · 2006 to 2010
$1.6M
Acoustic and electrical hearing after Math1 treatmentR55DC007634 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PFINGST, BRYAN E · 2005 to 2005
$100k
Across-Site Patterns of Modulation Detection: Relation to Speech RecognitionF32DC010318 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GARADAT, SOHA N · 2009 to 2010
$97k
Across-Site Patterns of Cochlear Implant Function: Importance of Cochlear HealthR56DC010786 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PFINGST, BRYAN E · 2016 to 2016
$75k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC010318NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC005188NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004312NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007634NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010412NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010786NIDCD NIH HHS R55 DC007634NIDCD NIH HHS R56 DC010786NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the cochlear implant is already the world's most successful neural prosthesis, opportunities for further improvement abound. Promising areas of current research include work on improving the biological infrastructure in the implanted cochlea to optimize reception of cochlear implant stimulation and on designing the pattern of electrical stimulation to take maximal advantage of conditions in the implanted cochlea. In this review we summarize what is currently known about conditions in the cochlea of deaf, implanted humans and then review recent work from our animal laboratory investigating the effects of preserving or reinnervating tissues on psychophysical and electrophysiological measures of implant function. Additionally we review work from our human laboratory on optimizing the pattern of electrical stimulation to better utilize strengths in the cochlear infrastructure. Histological studies of human temporal bones from implant users and from people who would have been candidates for implants show a range of pathologic conditions including spiral ganglion cell counts ranging from approximately 2% to 92% of normal and partial hair cell survival in some cases. To duplicate these conditions in a guinea pig model, we use a variety of deafening and implantation procedures as well as post-deafening therapies designed to protect neurons and/or regenerate neurites. Across populations of human patients, relationships between nerve survival and functional measures such as speech have been difficult to demonstrate, possibly due to the numerous subject variables that can affect implant function and the elapsed time between functional measures and postmortem histology. However, psychophysical studies across stimulation sites within individual human subjects suggest that biological conditions near the implanted electrodes contribute significantly to implant function, and this is supported by studies in animal models comparing histological findings to psychophysical and electrophysiological data. Results of these studies support the efforts to improve the biological infrastructure in the implanted ear and guide strategies which optimize stimulation patterns to match patient-specific conditions in the cochlea.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsCorrection of Hearing ImpairmentAcoustic StimulationAnimalsCochleaCochlear ImplantationDeafnessElectric StimulationHumansModels, AnimalNerve RegenerationPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesProsthesis DesignSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID21605648
PMCPMC3208788
OpenAlexW2007532890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.