Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21605376›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2011

Modelling effectiveness of herd level vaccination against Q fever in dairy cattle.

Aurélie Courcoul, Lenny Hogerwerf, Don Klinkenberg, Mirjam Nielen, Elisabeta Vergu, François Beaudeau

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular detection ofNew microbes and new infections · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Efficacy and Safety of an Inactivated Phase IAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  4. Modelling the Transmission ofVeterinary sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. One Health contributions towards more effective and equitable approaches to health in low- and middle-income countries.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aurélie CourcoulINRA, UMR1300 Bio-agression, Epidémiologie et Analyse de Risque, Atlanpole La Chantrerie, BP 40706, 44307 Nantes, France. aurelie.courcoul@oniris-nantes.fr.
Lenny Hogerwerf
Don Klinkenberg
Mirjam Nielen
Elisabeta Vergu
François Beaudeau
Utrecht University · NLBiopolymères Interactions Assemblages · FRMathématiques et Informatique Appliquées du Génome à l'Environnement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Q fever is a worldwide zoonosis caused by the bacterium Coxiella burnetii. The control of this infection in cattle is crucial: infected ruminants can indeed encounter reproductive disorders and represent the most important source of human infection. In the field, vaccination is currently advised in infected herds but the comparative effectiveness of different vaccination protocols has never been explored: the duration of the vaccination programme and the category of animals to be vaccinated have to be determined. Our objective was to compare, by simulation, the effectiveness over 10 years of three different vaccination strategies in a recently infected dairy cattle herd.A stochastic individual-based epidemic model coupled with a model of herd demography was developed to simulate three temporal outputs (shedder prevalence, environmental bacterial load and number of abortions) and to calculate the extinction rate of the infection. For all strategies, the temporal outputs were predicted to strongly decrease with time at least in the first years of vaccination. However, vaccinating only three years was predicted inadequate to stabilize these dynamic outputs at a low level. Vaccination of both cows and heifers was predicted as being slightly more effective than vaccinating heifers only. Although the simulated extinction rate of the infection was high for both scenarios, the outputs decreased slower when only heifers were vaccinated.Our findings shed new light on vaccination effectiveness related to Q fever. Moreover, the model can be further modified for simulating and assessing various Q fever control strategies such as environmental and hygienic measures.

Indexed as

Bacterial SheddingAbortion, VeterinaryAnimalsBacterial LoadCattleCattle DiseasesComputer SimulationDairyingFemaleModels, BiologicalPrevalenceQ FeverSeasonsStochastic ProcessesVaccination

Identifiers

PMID21605376
PMCPMC3125226
OpenAlexW2132467169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.