Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21605352›Full record

Trial reportTrials2011

The effectiveness of early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma (EAGLE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Augusto Azuara-Blanco, Jennifer M Burr, Claire Cochran, Craig Ramsay, Luke Vale, Paul Foster, David Friedman, Zahidul Quayyum, Jimmy Lai, Winnie Nolan and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Lens extraction for chronic angle-closure glaucoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The management of patients with cataracts and medically uncontrolled glaucoma.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Augusto Azuara-BlancoThe Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK. aazblanco@abdn.ac.uk
Jennifer M Burr
Claire Cochran
Craig Ramsay
Luke Vale
Paul Foster
David Friedman
Zahidul Quayyum
Jimmy Lai
Winnie Nolan
Tin Aung
Paul Chew
Gladys McPherson
Alison McDonald
John Norrie
Effectiveness in Angle-closure Glaucoma of Lens Extraction (EAGLE) Study Group
University of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HERU1Chief Scientist Office HERU2Chief Scientist Office HSRU1Medical Research Council G0701604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness. Although primary open-angle glaucoma is more common, primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) is more likely to result in irreversible blindness. By 2020, 5·3 million people worldwide will be blind because of PACG. The current standard care for PACG is a stepped approach of a combination of laser iridotomy surgery (to open the drainage angle) and medical treatment (to reduce intraocular pressure). If these treatments fail, glaucoma surgery (eg, trabeculectomy) is indicated. It has been proposed that, because the lens of the eye plays a major role in the mechanisms leading to PACG, early clear lens extraction will improve glaucoma control by opening the drainage angle. This procedure might reduce the need for drugs and glaucoma surgery, maintain good visual acuity, and improve quality of life compared with standard care.EAGLE aims to evaluate whether early lens extraction improves patient-reported, clinical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness, compared with standard care. METHODS/

designEAGLE is a multicentre pragmatic randomized trial. All people presenting to the recruitment centres in the UK and east Asia with newly diagnosed PACG and who are at least 50 years old are eligible.The primary outcomes are EQ-5D, intraocular pressure, and incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Other outcomes are: vision and glaucoma-specific patient-reported outcomes, visual acuity, visual field, angle closure, number of medications, additional surgery (e.g., trabeculectomy), costs to the health services and patients, and adverse events.A single main analysis will be done at the end of the trial, after three years of follow-up. The analysis will be based on all participants as randomized (intention to treat). 400 participants (200 in each group) will be recruited, to have 90% power at 5% significance level to detect a difference in EQ-5D score between the two groups of 0·05, and a mean difference in intraocular pressure of 1·75 mm Hg. The study will have 80% power to detect a difference of 15% in the glaucoma surgery rate.

trial registrationISRCTN44464607.

Indexed as

Lens Implantation, IntraocularPhacoemulsificationResearch DesignAsiaCost-Benefit AnalysisGlaucoma, Angle-ClosureHealth Care CostsHumansIntraocular PressureLens, CrystallineLenses, IntraocularMiddle AgedOphthalmic SolutionsQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionSurveys and QuestionnairesOphthalmic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID21605352
PMCPMC3121608
OpenAlexW2155719234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.