Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21604835›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2011

Glossopharyngeal nerve transection impairs unconditioned avoidance of diverse bitter stimuli in rats.

Laura C Geran, Susan P Travers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gustatory and olfactory-guided responsiveness to maltodextrin solutions in mice.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mouse Parabrachial Neurons Signal a Relationship between Bitter Taste and Nociceptive Stimuli.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Temporal signatures of taste quality driven by active sensing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura C GeranOral Biology, Ohio State University, College of Dentistry, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. geran.1@osu.edu
Susan P Travers
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

GUSTATORY AFFERENT ORGANIZATION IN THE SOLITARY NUCLEUSR01DC000416 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI TRAVERS, SUSAN P · 1992 to 2013
$2.7M
Effect of Receptive Field on Bitter Taste CodingR03DC008678 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GERAN, LAURA C · 2007 to 2009
$225k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000416NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC000416NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC008678NIDCD NIH HHS R03-DC008678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing evidence of heterogeneity among responses to bitter stimuli at the peripheral, central and behavioral levels. For instance, the glossopharyngeal (GL) nerve and neurons receiving its projections are more responsive to bitter stimuli than the chorda tympani (CT) nerve, and this is particularly true for some bitter stimuli like PROP & cycloheximide that stimulate the GL to a far greater extent. Given this information, we hypothesized that cutting the GL would have a greater effect on behavioral avoidance of cycloheximide and PROP than quinine and denatonium, which also stimulate the CT, albeit to a lesser degree than salts and acids. Forty male SD rats were divided into four surgery groups: bilateral GL transection (GLX), chorda tympani transection (CTX), SHAM surgery, and combined transection (CTX + GLX). Postsurgical avoidance functions were generated for the four bitter stimuli using a brief-access test. GLX significantly compromised avoidance compared to both CTX and SHAM groups for all stimuli (p < .02), while CTX and SHAM groups did not differ. Contrary to our hypothesis, GLX had a greater effect on quinine than cycloheximide (mean shift of 1.02 vs. 0.27 log10 units). Moreover, combined CTX + GLX transection shifted the concentration-response function further than GLX alone for every stimulus except cycloheximide (ps < .03), suggesting that the GSP nerve is capable of maintaining avoidance of this stimulus to a large degree. This hypothesis is supported by reports of cycloheximide-responsive cells with GSP-innervated receptive fields in the NST and PBN.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsAvoidance LearningChorda Tympani NerveCycloheximideDose-Response Relationship, DrugGlossopharyngeal Nerve InjuriesLearning DisabilitiesMaleProtein Synthesis InhibitorsQuinineRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyStimulation, ChemicalTasteTaste ThresholdCycloheximideProtein Synthesis InhibitorsQuinine

Identifiers

PMID21604835
PMCPMC3779807
OpenAlexW2119175441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.