Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21604149›Full record

ArticleVirus genes2011

Comparative complete genome analysis of Indian type A foot-and-mouth disease virus field isolates.

Saravanan Subramaniam, Aniket Sanyal, Jajati K Mohapatra, Divakar Hemadri, Bramhadev Pattnaik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virus genes, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saravanan SubramaniamProject Directorate on Foot-and-mouth disease, Mukteswar-Kumaon, Nainital 263138, Uttarakhand, India.
Aniket Sanyal
Jajati K Mohapatra
Divakar Hemadri
Bramhadev Pattnaik

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative complete genome analysis of 17 serotype A Indian field isolates representing different genotypes and sub-lineages is presented in this report. Overall 79% of amino acids were invariant in the coding region. Chunk deletion of nucleotide was observed in S and L fragment of 5'-UTR. More variability which is comparable to that of capsid coding region was found in L and 3A region. Functional motifs and residues critical for virus biology were conserved most. Polyprotein cleavage sites accepted few changes. Many sites were detected to be under positive selection in L, P1, 2C, 3A, 3C, and 3D region and of which some are functionally important and antigenically critical. Genotype/lineage specific signature residues could be identified which implies evolution under different selection pressure. Transmembrane domain could be predicted in 2B, 2C, 3A, and 3C proteins in agreement with their membrane binding properties. Phylogenetic analysis at complete coding region placed the isolates in genotype IV, VI, and VII and two broad clusters comprising VP3(59)-deletion and non-deletion group within genotypes VII. The VP3(59)-deletion group has diversified genetically with time giving rise to three lineages. Incongruence in tree topology observed for different non structural protein coding region and UTRs-based phylogeny indicate suspected recombination.

Indexed as

3' Untranslated Regions5' Untranslated RegionsAnimalsEpitopes, T-LymphocyteFoot-and-Mouth Disease VirusGenetic VariationGenome, ViralOpen Reading FramesPhylogenyProtein Structure, TertiaryRecombination, Genetic3' Untranslated Regions5' Untranslated RegionsEpitopes, T-Lymphocyte

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.