ArticleJournal of geriatric oncology2011
Phase I Clinical Trials in Patients ≥80.
Article in Journal of geriatric oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of age on dose-limiting toxicities in phase I dose-escalation trials.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2014Pooled it
- Access to early-phase clinical trials in older patients with cancer in France: the EGALICAN-2 study.ESMO open · 2022Article
- Health and personal resources in older patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phase I clinical trials play a crucial role in development of therapeutics for cancer patients. During phase I clinical trials common toxicities are delineated, dose limiting toxicities (DLT) are determined and a dose for phase II studies is recommended. However, reviews of the phase I population indicate a younger group of participants with a median age of 50-55. No data exists on the performance of octogenarians on phase I trials. Concerns for enrollment of this patient population, relates to presence of comorbidities and possibly altered pharmacokinetics in the setting of unknown potential toxicities. We present herein the largest review of octogenarians on phase I trials. Twenty-two octogenarian patients with a median age of 83 were enrolled on phase I clinical trials. More than 50% of them were chemotherapy-naïve most likely indicative of the fact that treating physicians believed standard therapy to be potentially toxic to this population. These 22 patients were otherwise matched in terms of performance status and other parameters to a control group of participants < 80. This includes a similar number of cycles administered. Patients ≥80 had a 3 fold higher rate of achieving DLT (p=0.06) compared to the control group enrolled at the same dose level. The toxicities observed include cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and infectious complications. Three patients were enrolled on molecular targeted treatments with no significant toxicities. We conclude that enrollment of patients ≥80 on phase I trials of chemotherapy agents is most likely associated with higher risk of DLT.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.