ArticleOpen medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal2009
Health promotion activity in primary care: performance of models and associated factors.
Article in Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of Variation in Organizational Definitions of Primary Care Panels: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2022Pooled it
- Identification, summary and comparison of tools used to measure organizational attributes associated with chronic disease management within primary care settings.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2014Pooled it
- Comparison of primary care models in the prevention of cardiovascular disease - a cross sectional study.BMC family practice · 2011Trial
- Professional beliefs of physicians and allied health professionals and their willingness to promote health in primary care: a cross-sectional survey.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Workload and patterns of care in the Timmins Family Health Team in Ontario.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Rheumatology Workforce Supply Changes in Ontario, Canada, from 2000 to 2030.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the quality of service delivery in private sector, primary care clinics in Kenya: A descriptive patient survey.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2020Article
- Exploring the utility of the Nursing Role Effectiveness Model in evaluating nursing contributions in primary health care: A scoping review.Nursing open · 2019Article
- Multidisciplinary work promotes preventive medicine and health education in primary care: a cross-sectional survey.Israel journal of health policy research · 2019Article
- Team composition and chronic disease management within primary healthcare practices in eastern Ontario: an application of the Measuring Organizational Attributes of Primary Health Care Survey.Primary health care research & development · 2018Article
- Nutrition and obesity care in multidisciplinary primary care settings in Ontario, Canada: Short duration of visits and complex health problems perceived as barriers.Preventive medicine reports · 2018Article
- Physical activity assessment and counseling in Quebec family medicine groups.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2018Article
- Factors related to the development of health-promoting community activities in Spanish primary healthcare: two caseBMJ open · 2017Article
- Integrating care for frequent users of emergency departments: implementation evaluation of a brief multi-organizational intensive case management intervention.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- What is the impact of primary care model type on specialist referral rates? A cross-sectional study.BMC family practice · 2014Article
- The untold story: examining Ontario's community health centres' initiatives to address upstream determinants of health.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2014Article
- Delivery of primary health care to persons who are socio-economically disadvantaged: does the organizational delivery model matter?BMC health services research · 2013Article
- Practice size, financial sharing and quality of care.BMC health services research · 2013Article
- Patient poverty and workload in primary care: study of prescription drug benefit recipients in community health centres.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2013Article
- How many patients should a family physician have? Factors to consider in answering a deceptively simple question.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLifestyle behaviours have significant health and economic consequences. Primary care providers play an important role in promoting healthy behaviours. We compared the performance of primary care models in delivering health promotion and identified practice factors associated with its delivery.
methodsSurveys were conducted in 137 randomly selected primary care practices in 4 primary care models in Ontario, Canada: 35 community health centres, 35 fee-for-service practices, 35 family health networks and 32 health service organizations. A total of 4861 adult patients who were visiting their family practice participated in the study. Qualitative nested case studies were also conducted at 2 practices per model. A 7-item question was used to evaluate health promotion. The main outcome was whether at least 1 of the 7 health promotion items was discussed at the survey visit. Multilevel logistic regressions were used to compare the models and determine performance-related practice factors.
resultsThe rate of health promotion was significantly higher in community health centres than in the other models (the unadjusted difference ranged between 8% and 13%). This finding persisted after controlling for patient and family physician profiles. Factors independently positively associated with health promotion were as follows: reason for visit (for a general checkup: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.81-3.97; for care for a chronic disease: AOR 2.03, 95% CI 1.69-2.43), patients having and seeing their own provider (for those not: AOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78), number of nurses in the practice (AOR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.12), percentage of female family physicians (AOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.15-1.66), smaller physician panel size (AOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-1.01) and longer booking interval (AOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04). Providers in interdisciplinary practices viewed health promotion as an integral part of primary care, whereas other providers emphasized the role of relational continuity in effective health promotion.
conclusionWe have identified several attributes associated with health promotion delivery. These results may assist practice managers and policy-makers in modifying practice attributes to improve health promotion in primary care.
Identifiers
21603049PMC3090121W1560249859What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.