Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21602821›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2011

A differentially amplified motion in the ear for near-threshold sound detection.

Fangyi Chen, Dingjun Zha, Anders Fridberger, Jiefu Zheng, Niloy Choudhury, Steven L Jacques, Ruikang K Wang, Xiaorui Shi, Alfred L Nuttall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Developing a Virtual Model of the Rhesus Macaque Inner Ear.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Advective mass transport along the cochlear coil.AIP conference proceedings · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cochlear outer hair cell electromotility enhances organ of Corti motion on a cycle-by-cycle basis at high frequencies in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fangyi ChenOregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Dingjun Zha
Anders Fridberger
Jiefu Zheng
Niloy Choudhury
Steven L Jacques
Ruikang K Wang
Xiaorui Shi
Alfred L Nuttall

Funding

The mechanical and ionic roles of cochlear fluids in hearing and hearing lossR01DC000141 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI REN, TIANYING · 1989 to 2025
$12.5M
Volumetric imaging of blood perfusion and tissue morphology in the cochleaR01DC010201 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WANG, RUIKANG · 2009 to 2013
$2.2M
Fibrovascular coupling in the cochlea and pericyte recruitment after noiseR01DC010844 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI SHI, XIAORUI · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
3-D optical imaging of the in vivo organ of Corti motion at a sub-nanometer scaleR01DC010399 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI NUTTALL, ALFRED L · 2010 to 2013
$1.5M
NATURE AND MEASUREMENT OF MODIFIABILITYK23DC000141 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI PENA, ELIZABETH D · 1999 to 2002
$310k
PLANNING PROCESSES IN SENTENCE PRODUCTIONF32DC000141 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HUITEMA, JOHN S · 1994 to 1995
–
NIDCD NIH HHS DC00141NIDCD NIH HHS DC010201NIDCD NIH HHS DC010399NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC000141NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC000141NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000141NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010399NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ear is a remarkably sensitive pressure fluctuation detector. In guinea pigs, behavioral measurements indicate a minimum detectable sound pressure of ∼20 μPa at 16 kHz. Such faint sounds produce 0.1-nm basilar membrane displacements, a distance smaller than conformational transitions in ion channels. It seems that noise within the auditory system would swamp such tiny motions, making weak sounds imperceptible. Here we propose a new mechanism contributing to a resolution of this problem and validate it through direct measurement. We hypothesized that vibration at the apical side of hair cells is enhanced compared with that at the commonly measured basilar membrane side. Using in vivo optical coherence tomography, we demonstrated that apical-side vibrations peaked at a higher frequency, had different timing and were enhanced compared with those at the basilar membrane. These effects depend nonlinearly on the stimulus sound pressure level. The timing difference and enhancement of vibrations are important for explaining how the noise problem is circumvented.

Indexed as

MotionSoundVibrationAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory ThresholdBasilar MembraneCochleaGuinea PigsHair Cells, AuditoryTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID21602821
PMCPMC3225052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.