Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21602509›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2011

A bayesian mixture model for comparative spectral count data in shotgun proteomics.

James G Booth, Kirsten E Eilertson, Paul Dominic B Olinares, Haiyuan Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James G BoothDepartment of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Comstock Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. jim.booth@cornell.edu
Kirsten E Eilertson
Paul Dominic B Olinares
Haiyuan Yu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent developments in mass-spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics, especially methods using spectral counting, have enabled large-scale identification and differential profiling of complex proteomes. Most such proteomic studies are interested in identifying proteins, the abundance of which is different under various conditions. Several quantitative methods have recently been proposed and implemented for this purpose. Building on some techniques that are now widely accepted in the microarray literature, we developed and implemented a new method using a Bayesian model to calculate posterior probabilities of differential abundance for thousands of proteins in a given experiment simultaneously. Our Bayesian model is shown to deliver uniformly superior performance when compared with several existing methods.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremModels, BiologicalSoftwareData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLikelihood FunctionsMarkov ChainsMonte Carlo MethodProteomeProteomicsReference StandardsROC CurveSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTandem Mass SpectrometryProteomeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21602509
PMCPMC3149093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.