Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21602352›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2011

Antiparallel and interlinked control of cellular iron levels by the Irr and RirA regulators of Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

Michael E Hibbing, Clay Fuqua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. mBio · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Fe-S proteins that regulate gene expression.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael E HibbingDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405-1847, USA.
Clay Fuqua
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

TRAINING IN GENETICST32GM007757 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI KUMAR, JUSTIN P · 1985 to 2014
$8.1M
Synthesis and function of a unipolar expolysaccharide in AgrobacteriumR01GM080546 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI FUQUA, WILLIAM C · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080546NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM080546NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007757NIGMS NIH HHS T32-GM007757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens encodes predicted iron-responsive regulators, Irr and RirA, that function in several other bacteria to control the response to environmental iron levels. Deletion mutations of irr and rirA, alone and in combination, were evaluated for their impact on cellular iron response. Growth was severely diminished in the Δirr mutant under iron-limiting conditions, but reversed to wild-type levels in an Δirr ΔrirA mutant. The level of uncomplexed iron in the Δirr mutant was decreased, whereas the ΔrirA mutant exhibited elevated iron levels. Sensitivity of the Δirr and ΔrirA mutants to iron-activated antimicrobial compounds generally reflected their uncomplexed-iron levels. Expression of genes that encode iron uptake systems was decreased in the Δirr mutant, whereas that of iron utilization genes was increased. Irr function required a trihistidine repeat likely to mediate interactions with heme. Iron uptake genes were derepressed in the ΔrirA mutant. In the Δirr ΔrirA mutant, iron uptake and utilization genes were derepressed, roughly combining the phenotypes of the single mutants. Siderophore production was elevated in the rirA mutant, but most strongly regulated by an RirA-controlled sigma factor. Expression of rirA itself was regulated by Irr, RirA, and iron availability, in contrast to irr expression, which was relatively stable in the different mutants. These studies suggest that in A. tumefaciens, the Irr protein is most active under low-iron conditions, inhibiting iron utilization and activating iron acquisition, while the RirA protein is active under high-iron conditions, repressing iron uptake.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialAgrobacterium tumefaciensBacterial ProteinsIronTranscription FactorsBacterial ProteinsIronTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21602352
PMCPMC3133315
OpenAlexW2133063979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.