ArticleJournal of molecular graphics & modelling2011
Structural determinants of the alpha2 adrenoceptor subtype selectivity.
Article in Journal of molecular graphics & modelling, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Discovery of Novel αInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Distinct activation mechanisms regulate subtype selectivity of Cannabinoid receptors.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Synthesis and biological evaluation of N-arylpiperazine derivatives of 4,4-dimethylisoquinoline-1,3(2H,4H)-dione as potential antiplatelet agents.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2018Article
- The C-terminal half of the α2C-adrenoceptor determines the receptor's membrane expression level and drug selectivity.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alpha2-adrenergic receptor (α2-AR) subtypes, acting mainly on the central nervous and cardiovascular systems, represent important targets for drug design, confirmed by the high number of studies published so far. Presently, only a few α2-AR subtype selective compounds are known. Using homology modeling and ligand docking, the present study analyzes the similarities and differences between binding sites, and between extracellular loops of the three subtypes of α2-ARs. Several α2-AR subtype selective ligands were docked into the active sites of the three α2-AR subtypes, key interactions between ligands and receptors were mapped, and the predicted results were compared with the available experimental data. Binding site analysis reveals a strong identity between important amino acid residues in each receptor, the very few differences being the key toward modulating selectivity of α2-AR ligands. The observed differences between binding site residues provide an excellent starting point for virtual screening of chemical databases, in order to identify potentially selective ligands for α2-ARs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.