ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2011
Collaboration between general practitioners and mental health care professionals: a qualitative study.
Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- "It's more than just physical care": a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of nurses' evolving role in providing mental health care within primary health care systems.BMC primary care · 2026Pooled it
- Joint consultations in a structured GP-patient-geriatric-psychiatrist model for late-life depression: a cluster RCT.BMC primary care · 2025Trial
- A collaborative primary and mental health care model with psychologist and psychiatrist working in GP practices: process evaluation of the implementation, challenges, and sustainability.BMC health services research · 2025Trial
- Collaborative care for mental health: a qualitative study of the experiences of patients and health professionals.BMC health services research · 2020Trial
- Well-functioning depression care collaboration: general practitioners' experiences with specialized mental health services.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Managing patients with mental health conditions in family medicine: a qualitative study exploring the experiences of general practitioners' experiences in Switzerland.Family practice · 2026Article
- Joint consultations with general practitioners and geriatric psychiatrists for older adults with depression: a focus group study.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Improving frequency and content of referral correspondence between general practitioners and psychiatrists: a cross-sectional descriptive study.Primary health care research & development · 2025Observational
- Collaborative challenges during transition of patients with severe depression from secondary mental health services to primary care and opportunities for improvement - a qualitative study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Returning-to-work after mental health-associated sick leave: a qualitative interview study exploring the experiences of general practitioners in Germany.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Family physicians collaborating for health system integration: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Article
- Assessment of risk factors of treatment discontinuation among patients on paliperidone palmitate and risperidone microspheres in France, Germany and Belgium.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Recovery-Oriented Cross-Sectoral Network Meetings between Mental Health Hospital Professionals and Community Mental Health Professionals: A Critical Discourse Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Article
- Factors of Specialized Mental Health Care Use in the Netherlands: A Scoping Review Applying Andersen-Newman's Care Utilization Model.Health services insights · 2021Article
- "People just don't understand their role in it." Collaboration and coordination of care for service users with complex and severe mental health problems.Perspectives in psychiatric care · 2020Article
- Competencies to promote collaboration between primary and secondary care doctors: an integrative review.BMC family practice · 2020Review
- Personal-recovery-oriented community mental healthcare: qualitative evaluation of a developmental project.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Psychotherapists' perspectives on collaboration and stepped care in outpatient psychotherapy-A qualitative study.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCollaboration between general practice and mental health care has been recognised as necessary to provide good quality healthcare services to people with mental health problems. Several studies indicate that collaboration often is poor, with the result that patient' needs for coordinated services are not sufficiently met, and that resources are inefficiently used. An increasing number of mental health care workers should improve mental health services, but may complicate collaboration and coordination between mental health workers and other professionals in the treatment chain. The aim of this qualitative study is to investigate strengths and weaknesses in today's collaboration, and to suggest improvements in the interaction between General Practitioners (GPs) and specialised mental health service.
methodsThis paper presents a qualitative focus group study with data drawn from six groups and eight group sessions with 28 health professionals (10 GPs, 12 nurses, and 6 physicians doing post-doctoral training in psychiatry), all working in the same region and assumed to make professional contact with each other.
resultsGPs and mental health professionals shared each others expressions of strengths, weaknesses and suggestions for improvement in today's collaboration. Strengths in today's collaboration were related to common consultations between GPs and mental health professionals, and when GPs were able to receive advice about diagnostic treatment dilemmas. Weaknesses were related to the GPs' possibility to meet mental health professionals, and lack of mutual knowledge in mental health services. The results describe experiences and importance of interpersonal knowledge, mutual accessibility and familiarity with existing systems and resources. There is an agreement between GPs and mental health professionals that services will improve with shared knowledge about patients through systematic collaborative services, direct cell-phone lines to mental health professionals and allocated times for telephone consultation.
conclusionsGPs and mental health professionals experience collaboration as important. GPs are the gate-keepers to specialised health care, and lack of collaboration seems to create problems for GPs, mental health professionals, and for the patients. Suggestions for improvement included identification of situations that could increase mutual knowledge, and make it easier for GPs to reach the right mental health care professional when needed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.