Trial reportTrials2011
Study protocol: ICONS: identifying continence options after stroke: a randomised trial.
Trial report in Trials, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06385769 (Efficacy of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Neurogenic Overactive Bladder After Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Neurogenic Overactive Bladder After Stroke: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence-based practices in stroke rehabilitation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Interventions for treating urinary incontinence after stroke in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Systematic voiding programme in adults with urinary incontinence following acute stroke: the ICONS-II RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2022Trial
- Identifying continence options after stroke (ICONS): a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial.Trials · 2014Trial
- Technology-assisted toilets: Improving independence and hygiene in stroke rehabilitation.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUrinary incontinence following acute stroke is common, affecting between 40%-60% of people in hospital after a stroke. Despite the availability of clinical guidelines for urinary incontinence and urinary incontinence after stroke, national audit data suggest incontinence is often poorly managed. Conservative interventions (e.g. bladder training, pelvic floor muscle training and prompted voiding) have been shown to have some effect with participants in Cochrane systematic reviews, but have not had their effectiveness demonstrated with stroke patients. METHODS/
designA cluster randomised controlled pilot trial designed to assess the feasibility of a full-scale cluster randomised trial and to provide preliminary evidence of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a systematic voiding programme for the management of continence after stroke. Stroke services will be randomised to receive the systematic voiding programme, the systematic voiding programme plus supported implementation, or usual care. The trial aims to recruit at least 780 participants in 12 stroke services (4 per arm). The primary outcome is presence/absence of incontinence at six weeks post-stroke. Secondary outcomes include frequency and severity of incontinence, quality of life and cost-utility. Outcomes will be measured at six weeks, three months and (for participants recruited in the first three months) twelve months after stroke. Process data will include rates of recruitment and retention and fidelity of intervention delivery. An integrated qualitative evaluation will be conducted in order to describe implementation and assist in explaining the potential mediators and modifiers of the process.
trial registrationISRCTN: ISRCTN08609907
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.