Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21599945›Full record

Trial reportTrials2011

Study protocol: ICONS: identifying continence options after stroke: a randomised trial.

Lois H Thomas, Caroline L Watkins, Beverley French, Christopher Sutton, Denise Forshaw, Francine Cheater, Brenda Roe, Michael J Leathley, Christopher Burton, Elaine McColl and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06385769 (Efficacy of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Neurogenic Overactive Bladder After Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06385769 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Neurogenic Overactive Bladder After Stroke: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorPamukkale UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled22ConditionsUrinary Bladder, OveractiveArmsTranscutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS), Sham Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for treating urinary incontinence after stroke in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Technology-assisted toilets: Improving independence and hygiene in stroke rehabilitation.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lois H ThomasSchool of Health, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK. lhthomas@uclan.ac.uk
Caroline L Watkins
Beverley French
Christopher Sutton
Denise Forshaw
Francine Cheater
Brenda Roe
Michael J Leathley
Christopher Burton
Elaine McColl
Jo Booth
ICONS Project Team
ICONS Patient, Public and Carer Involvement Group
University of Lancashire · GBBangor University · GBEdge Hill University · GBGlasgow Caledonian University · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0707-10059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary incontinence following acute stroke is common, affecting between 40%-60% of people in hospital after a stroke. Despite the availability of clinical guidelines for urinary incontinence and urinary incontinence after stroke, national audit data suggest incontinence is often poorly managed. Conservative interventions (e.g. bladder training, pelvic floor muscle training and prompted voiding) have been shown to have some effect with participants in Cochrane systematic reviews, but have not had their effectiveness demonstrated with stroke patients. METHODS/

designA cluster randomised controlled pilot trial designed to assess the feasibility of a full-scale cluster randomised trial and to provide preliminary evidence of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a systematic voiding programme for the management of continence after stroke. Stroke services will be randomised to receive the systematic voiding programme, the systematic voiding programme plus supported implementation, or usual care. The trial aims to recruit at least 780 participants in 12 stroke services (4 per arm). The primary outcome is presence/absence of incontinence at six weeks post-stroke. Secondary outcomes include frequency and severity of incontinence, quality of life and cost-utility. Outcomes will be measured at six weeks, three months and (for participants recruited in the first three months) twelve months after stroke. Process data will include rates of recruitment and retention and fidelity of intervention delivery. An integrated qualitative evaluation will be conducted in order to describe implementation and assist in explaining the potential mediators and modifiers of the process.

trial registrationISRCTN: ISRCTN08609907

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesResearch DesignStroke RehabilitationFeasibility StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPatient Education as TopicPelvic FloorQuality of LifeStrokeSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomUrinary BladderUrinary Incontinence

Identifiers

PMID21599945
PMCPMC3113990
OpenAlexW2160798951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.