Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21599914›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2011

Isolation and analysis of high quality nuclear DNA with reduced organellar DNA for plant genome sequencing and resequencing.

Kerry A Lutz, Wenqin Wang, Anna Zdepski, Todd P Michael

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ancient wheat DNA: How and what for?Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Conservation Genomics ofEvolutionary applications · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Analysis of metagenomic data.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Role ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Algal research · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kerry A LutzRutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Department of Plant Biology and Pathology, The Waksman Institute of Microbiology, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. lutzk@farmingdale.edu
Wenqin Wang
Anna Zdepski
Todd P Michael
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USFarmingdale State College · USMonsanto (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies have revolutionized the field of genomics by drastically reducing the cost of sequencing, making it feasible for individual labs to sequence or resequence plant genomes. Obtaining high quality, high molecular weight DNA from plants poses significant challenges due to the high copy number of chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA, as well as high levels of phenolic compounds and polysaccharides. Multiple methods have been used to isolate DNA from plants; the CTAB method is commonly used to isolate total cellular DNA from plants that contain nuclear DNA, as well as chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA. Alternatively, DNA can be isolated from nuclei to minimize chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA contamination.

resultsWe describe optimized protocols for isolation of nuclear DNA from eight different plant species encompassing both monocot and eudicot species. These protocols use nuclei isolation to minimize chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA contamination. We also developed a protocol to determine the number of chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA copies relative to the nuclear DNA using quantitative real time PCR (qPCR). We compared DNA isolated from nuclei to total cellular DNA isolated with the CTAB method. As expected, DNA isolated from nuclei consistently yielded nuclear DNA with fewer chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA copies, as compared to the total cellular DNA prepared with the CTAB method. This protocol will allow for analysis of the quality and quantity of nuclear DNA before starting a plant whole genome sequencing or resequencing experiment.

conclusionsExtracting high quality, high molecular weight nuclear DNA in plants has the potential to be a bottleneck in the era of whole genome sequencing and resequencing. The methods that are described here provide a framework for researchers to extract and quantify nuclear DNA in multiple types of plants.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusDNA, PlantGenome, PlantPlantsSequence Analysis, DNASorghumZea maysDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID21599914
PMCPMC3131251
OpenAlexW1987748394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.