ReviewBMC infectious diseases2011
MRSA prevalence in European healthcare settings: a review.
Review in BMC infectious diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Occupational Infection Risk with Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in Health Personnel-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Pooled it
- Determinants of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence in the Asia-Pacific region: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of global antimicrobial resistance · 2019Pooled it
- A systematic review of transmission dynamic studies of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in non-hospital residential facilities.BMC infectious diseases · 2018Pooled it
- MRSA carriage among healthcare workers in non-outbreak settings in Europe and the United States: a systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2014Pooled it
- A systematic review of risk factors associated with surgical site infections among surgical patients.PloS one · 2013Pooled it
- A targeted infection prevention intervention in nursing home residents with indwelling devices: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2015Trial
- Infection control and wound care innovations in plastic surgery: a multidisciplinary approach.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Impact of a multimodal hand hygiene intervention on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage among healthcare workers in Libya: a quasi-experimental pre-post study.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2026Article
- Engineering a Potent Anti-MRSA Agent: The Development and Characterization of Chimeric Endolysin ZAM-MSC.Iranian biomedical journal · 2025Article
- Phenyltriazole-based sulfonamides: novel dual-target agents against MRSA biofilms and resistant pathogens.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluation of multidrug-resistant bacteria and their molecular mechanisms found in small animal veterinary practices in Portugal.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- An integrated framework for antimicrobial resistance: links with climate change and vulnerability.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Molecular Characterization of Aminoglycoside-modifying Enzymes (AMEs)in Aminoglycoside-ResistantIranian journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Epidemiological and microbiological characteristics ofFrontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Investigating the feasibility and potential of combining industry AMR monitoring systems: a comparison with WHO GLASS.Wellcome open research · 2024Article
- Dyeing Performance and Anti-Superbacterial Activity of Cotton Fabrics Dyed withMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Whole Genome Sequencing and Molecular Epidemiology of Clinical Isolates ofMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Photodynamic Antimicrobial Activity of a Novel 5,10,15,20-Tetrakis (4-Ethylphenyl) Porphyrin against Clinically Important Bacteria.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Association of Antibacterial Susceptibility Profile with the Prevalence of Genes Encoding Efflux Proteins in the Bangladeshi Clinical Isolates ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the past two decades, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become increasingly common as a source of nosocomial infections. Most studies of MRSA surveillance were performed during outbreaks, so that results are not applicable to settings in which MRSA is endemic. This paper gives an overview of MRSA prevalence in hospitals and other healthcare institutions in non-outbreak situations in Western Europe.
methodsA keyword search was conducted in the Medline database (2000 through June 2010). Titles and abstracts were screened to identify studies on MRSA prevalence in patients in non-outbreak situations in European healthcare facilities. Each study was assessed using seven quality criteria (outcome definition, time unit, target population, participants, observer bias, screening procedure, swabbing sites) and categorized as 'good', 'fair', or 'poor'.
results31 observational studies were included in the review. Four of the studies were of good quality. Surveillance screening of MRSA was performed in long-term care (11 studies) and acute care (20 studies). Prevalence rates varied over a wide range, from less than 1% to greater than 20%. Prevalence in the acute care and long-term care settings was comparable. The prevalence of MRSA was expressed in various ways - the percentage of MRSA among patients (range between 1% and 24%), the percentage of MRSA among S. aureus isolates (range between 5% and 54%), and as the prevalence density (range between 0.4 and 4 MRSA cases per 1,000 patient days). The screening policy differed with respect to time points (on admission or during hospital stay), selection criteria (all admissions or patients at high risk for MRSA) and anatomical sampling sites.
conclusionsThis review underlines the methodological differences between studies of MRSA surveillance. For comparisons between different healthcare settings, surveillance methods and outcome calculations should be standardized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.