Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21599202›Full record

ArticlePhysical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics2011

Stochastic differential equation models for ion channel noise in Hodgkin-Huxley neurons.

Joshua H Goldwyn, Nikita S Imennov, Michael Famulare, Eric Shea-Brown

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluating the predictive accuracy of ion-channel models using data from multiple experimental designs.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Parameter inference for stochastic reaction models of ion channel gating from whole-cell voltage-clamp data.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Spike timing precision of neuronal circuits.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Stimulation Strategies for Tinnitus Suppression in a Neuron Model.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2018
    Article
  19. Methodology of Recurrent Laguerre-Volterra Network for Modeling Nonlinear Dynamic Systems.IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems · 2017
    Article
  20. Kölliker-Fuse nuclei regulate respiratory rhythm variability via a gain-control mechanism.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua H GoldwynUniversity of Washington, Department of Applied Mathematics, P.O. Box 352420, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Nikita S Imennov
Michael Famulare
Eric Shea-Brown

Funding

Auditory Neuroscience Traning ProgramT32DC005361 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Adrian KC Lee, DAVID J PERKEL · 2002 to 2026
$8.8M
A Model-Based Approach for Optimizing Cochlear Implant StimulationF31DC010306 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GOLDWYN, JOSHUA H. · 2009 to 2010
$66k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC010306NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC005361Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The random transitions of ion channels between conducting and nonconducting states generate a source of internal fluctuations in a neuron, known as channel noise. The standard method for modeling the states of ion channels nonlinearly couples continuous-time Markov chains to a differential equation for voltage. Beginning with the work of R. F. Fox and Y.-N. Lu [Phys. Rev. E 49, 3421 (1994)], there have been attempts to generate simpler models that use stochastic differential equation (SDEs) to approximate the stochastic spiking activity produced by Markov chain models. Recent numerical investigations, however, have raised doubts that SDE models can capture the stochastic dynamics of Markov chain models.We analyze three SDE models that have been proposed as approximations to the Markov chain model: one that describes the states of the ion channels and two that describe the states of the ion channel subunits. We show that the former channel-based approach can capture the distribution of channel noise and its effects on spiking in a Hodgkin-Huxley neuron model to a degree not previously demonstrated, but the latter two subunit-based approaches cannot. Our analysis provides intuitive and mathematical explanations for why this is the case. The temporal correlation in the channel noise is determined by the combinatorics of bundling subunits into channels, but the subunit-based approaches do not correctly account for this structure. Our study confirms and elucidates the findings of previous numerical investigations of subunit-based SDE models. Moreover, it presents evidence that Markov chain models of the nonlinear, stochastic dynamics of neural membranes can be accurately approximated by SDEs. This finding opens a door to future modeling work using SDE techniques to further illuminate the effects of ion channel fluctuations on electrically active cells.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansIon Channel GatingIon ChannelsMembrane PotentialsNeuronsStochastic ProcessesIon Channels

Identifiers

PMID21599202
PMCPMC3279159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.