ArticleChemMedChem2011
Delineation of the molecular mechanisms of nucleoside recognition by cytidine deaminase through virtual screening.
Article in ChemMedChem, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- DYW domain structures imply an unusual regulation principle in plant organellar RNA editing catalysis.Nature catalysis · 2021Article
- The Emerging Role of Cytidine Deaminase in Human Diseases: A New Opportunity for Therapy?Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2020Review
- Gemcitabine diphosphate choline is a major metabolite linked to the Kennedy pathway in pancreatic cancer models in vivo.British journal of cancer · 2014Article
- Article
- Facilitating adverse drug event detection in pharmacovigilance databases using molecular structure similarity: application to rhabdomyolysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2011Article
- Drug-drug interaction through molecular structure similarity analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cytidine deaminase (EC 3.5.4.5, CDA), an enzyme of the pyrimidine salvage pathways, is responsible for the degradation and inactivation of several cytidine-based antitumor drugs such as cytarabine, gemcitabine, decitabine, and azacytidine. Thus, CDA inhibitors are highly sought after as compounds to be co-administered with said drugs to improve their effectiveness. Alternatively, the design of antitumor drugs not susceptible to the action of CDA is also regarded as an attractive solution. Herein we describe a virtual screen for CDA ligands based on chemical similarity and molecular docking. The campaign led to the identification of three novel inhibitors and one novel substrate, with a 19 % hit rate, and allowed a significant extension of the structure-activity relationships, also in light of the compounds that resulted inactive. The most active compound identified through the screen is the inhibitor pseudoisocytidine, which has the potential to serve as a lead for highly stable compounds. The study also delineated the detrimental effect of 5-aza and 6-aza substitutions, the incompatibility of the presence of an amino group at the 3'-position, as well as the presence of very strict steric requirements around the 2'-arabino position and, even more, the N4-position. Importantly, these features can be exploited for the design of novel anti-neoplastic agents resistant to the action of CDA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.