Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21598390›Full record

ArticleProteomics2011

Systematic evaluation of alternating CID and ETD fragmentation for phosphorylated peptides.

Min-Sik Kim, Jun Zhong, Kumaran Kandasamy, Bernard Delanghe, Akhilesh Pandey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Min-Sik KimMcKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Jun Zhong
Kumaran Kandasamy
Bernard Delanghe
Akhilesh Pandey

Funding

TCP5: ACTIVE SITE LABELING REAGENT FOR ACETYLTRANSFERASESU54RR020839 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOEKE, JEF D · 2004 to 2011
$27.4M
Purchase of a Linear Ion Trap/Fourier Transform Mass SpectrometerS10RR023025 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COTTER, ROBERT JAMES · 2007 to 2007
$928k
NHLBI PROTEOMICS INITIATIVE-N01HV28180-268028180-268028180N01HV028180 · HV · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VAN EYK, JENNIFER E · 2002 to 2006
–
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR023025NCRR NIH HHS S10RR023025NCRR NIH HHS U54 RR020839NCRR NIH HHS U54RR020839NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HV-00240NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HV028180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CID has become a routine method for fragmentation of peptides in shotgun proteomics, whereas electron transfer dissociation (ETD) has been described as a preferred method for peptides carrying labile PTMs. Though both of these fragmentation techniques have their obvious advantages, they also have their own drawbacks. By combining data from CID and ETD fragmentation, some of these disadvantages can potentially be overcome because of the complementarity of fragment ions produced. To evaluate alternating CID and ETD fragmentation, we analyzed a complex mixture of phosphopeptides on an LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer. When the CID and ETD-derived spectra were searched separately, we observed 2504, 491, 2584, and 3249 phosphopeptide-spectrum matches from CID alone, ETD alone, decision tree-based CID/ETD, and alternating CID and ETD, respectively. Combining CID and ETD spectra prior to database searching should, intuitively, be superior to either method alone. However, when spectra from the alternating CID and ETD method were merged prior to database searching, we observed a reduction in the number of phosphopeptide-spectrum matches. The poorer identification rates observed after merging CID and ETD spectra are a reflection of a lack of optimized search algorithms for carrying out such searches and perhaps inherent weaknesses of this approach. Thus, although alternating CID and ETD experiments for phosphopeptide identification are desirable for increasing the confidence of identifications, merging spectra prior to database search has to be carefully evaluated further in the context of the various algorithms before adopting it as a routine strategy.

Indexed as

Air IonizationAlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinElectronsHumansPeptide FragmentsPhosphopeptidesPhosphorylationProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteomicsSpectrum AnalysisPeptide FragmentsPhosphopeptides

Identifiers

PMID21598390
PMCPMC3664225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.