Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21597953›Full record

ArticleArchives of virology2011

Uniformity of rotavirus strain nomenclature proposed by the Rotavirus Classification Working Group (RCWG).

Jelle Matthijnssens, Max Ciarlet, Sarah M McDonald, Houssam Attoui, Krisztián Bányai, J Rodney Brister, Javier Buesa, Mathew D Esona, Mary K Estes, Jon R Gentsch and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of virology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 417 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
417citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

417 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

357 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Jelle MatthijnssensLaboratory of Clinical & Epidemiological Virology, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, University of Leuven, Minderbroedersstraat 10, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. jelle.matthijnssens@uz.kuleuven.ac.be
Max Ciarlet
Sarah M McDonald
Houssam Attoui
Krisztián Bányai
J Rodney Brister
Javier Buesa
Mathew D Esona
Mary K Estes
Jon R Gentsch
Miren Iturriza-Gómara
Reimar Johne
Carl D Kirkwood
Vito Martella
Peter P C Mertens
Osamu Nakagomi
Viviana Parreño
Mustafizur Rahman
Franco M Ruggeri
Linda J Saif
Norma Santos
Andrej Steyer
Koki Taniguchi
John T Patton
Ulrich Desselberger
Marc Van Ranst

Funding

Regulation of Rotavirus ReplicationR01AI080656 · NIAID · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Sue Ellen Crawford, Mary Kolb Estes · 2009 to 2026
$7.9M
Modification Of The Antigenicity & Virulence Of Rotaviruses By Reverse GeneticsZIAAI000788 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI PATTON, JOHN · 2009 to 2015
$4.2M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00001446Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AI000788NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI080656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In April 2008, a nucleotide-sequence-based, complete genome classification system was developed for group A rotaviruses (RVs). This system assigns a specific genotype to each of the 11 genome segments of a particular RV strain according to established nucleotide percent cutoff values. Using this approach, the genome of individual RV strains are given the complete descriptor of Gx-P[x]-Ix-Rx-Cx-Mx-Ax-Nx-Tx-Ex-Hx. The Rotavirus Classification Working Group (RCWG) was formed by scientists in the field to maintain, evaluate and develop the RV genotype classification system, in particular to aid in the designation of new genotypes. Since its conception, the group has ratified 51 new genotypes: as of April 2011, new genotypes for VP7 (G20-G27), VP4 (P[28]-P[35]), VP6 (I12-I16), VP1 (R5-R9), VP2 (C6-C9), VP3 (M7-M8), NSP1 (A15-A16), NSP2 (N6-N9), NSP3 (T8-T12), NSP4 (E12-E14) and NSP5/6 (H7-H11) have been defined for RV strains recovered from humans, cows, pigs, horses, mice, South American camelids (guanaco), chickens, turkeys, pheasants, bats and a sugar glider. With increasing numbers of complete RV genome sequences becoming available, a standardized RV strain nomenclature system is needed, and the RCWG proposes that individual RV strains are named as follows: RV group/species of origin/country of identification/common name/year of identification/G- and P-type. In collaboration with the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), the RCWG is also working on developing a RV-specific resource for the deposition of nucleotide sequences. This resource will provide useful information regarding RV strains, including, but not limited to, the individual gene genotypes and epidemiological and clinical information. Together, the proposed nomenclature system and the NCBI RV resource will offer highly useful tools for investigators to search for, retrieve, and analyze the ever-growing volume of RV genomic data.

Indexed as

Terminology as TopicAnimalsGenome, ViralGenotypeHumansRotavirusSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID21597953
PMCPMC3398998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.