ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2011
Biologic markers determine both the risk and the timing of recurrence in breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed.
- A combination of hydroxytyrosol, omega-3 fatty acids and curcumin improves pain and inflammation among early stage breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant hormonal therapy: results of a pilot study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019Trial
- Use of Molecular Tools to Identify Patients With Indolent Breast Cancers With Ultralow Risk Over 2 Decades.JAMA oncology · 2017Trial
- A roadmap to reduce the incidence and mortality of breast cancer by rethinking our approach to women's health.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Review
- Clinical and molecular predictors of very late recurrence in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Navigating Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Conversion: Insights From Recurrent Breast Cancer.Cureus · 2024Article
- NDRGs in Breast Cancer: A Review and In Silico Analysis.Cancers · 2024Review
- Identification of VWA5A as a novel biomarker for inhibiting metastasis in breast cancer by machine-learning based protein prioritization.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparative long-term oncological outcomes of intraoperative radiotherapy vs. whole-breast irradiation in early breast cancer: a single institute study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based models for the prediction of breast cancer recurrence risk.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Prognostic influences of B-cell lymphoma 2-positive expression on late recurrence in breast cancer.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2023Article
- Association between breast cancer risk and disease aggressiveness: Characterizing underlying gene expression patterns.International journal of cancer · 2021Article
- The wisdom trial is based on faulty reasoning and has major design and execution problems.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2021Review
- Risk stratification for prediction of locoregional recurrence in patients with pathologic T1-2N0 breast cancer after mastectomy.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- Validation of Clinical Treatment Score post-5 years (CTS5) risk stratification in premenopausal breast cancer patients and Ki-67 labelling index.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Maternal obesity increases offspring's mammary cancer recurrence and impairs tumor immune response.Endocrine-related cancer · 2020Article
- Simulation of Chemotherapy Effects in Older Breast Cancer Patients With High Recurrence Scores.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2020Article
- Detection of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow predict late recurrences in operable breast cancer patients.BMC cancer · 2019Article
- Prediction of Late Breast Cancer-Specific Mortality in Recurrence-Free Breast Cancer Survivors Treated for Five Years with Tamoxifen.Journal of breast cancer · 2019Article
- Beyond 5 years: enduring risk of recurrence in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2019Review
- Intratumor Heterogeneity of the Estrogen Receptor and the Long-term Risk of Fatal Breast Cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer has a long natural history. Established and emerging biologic markers address overall risk but not necessarily timing of recurrence. 346 adjuvant naïve breast cancer cases from Guy's Hospital with 23 years minimum follow-up and archival blocks were recut and reassessed for hormone-receptors (HR), HER2-receptor and grade. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was analyzed by recursive partitioning. To validate insights from this analysis, gene-signatures (proliferative and HR-negative) were evaluated for their ability to predict early versus late metastatic risk in 683 node-negative, adjuvant naïve breast cancers annotated with expression microarray data. Risk partitioning showed that adjuvant naïve node-negative outcome risk was primarily partitioned by tumor receptor status and grade but not tumor size. HR-positive and HER2-negative (HRpos) risk was partitioned by tumor grade; low grade cases have very low early risk but a 20% fall-off in DSS 10 or more years after diagnosis. Higher grade HRpos cases have risk over >20 years. Triple-negative (Tneg) and HER2-positive (HER2pos) cases DSS events occurred primarily within the first 5 years. Among node-positive cases, only low grade conferred late risk, suggesting that proliferative gene signatures that identify proliferation would be important for predicting early but not late recurrence. Using pooled data from four publicly available data sets for node-negative tumors annotated with gene expression and outcome data, we evaluated four prognostic gene signatures: two proliferation-based and two immune function-based. Tumor proliferative capacity predicted early but not late metastatic risk for HRpos cases. The immune function or HRneg specific signatures predicted only early metastatic risk in Tneg and HER2pos cases. Breast cancer prognostic signatures need to inform both risk and timing of metastatic events and may best be applied within subsets. Current signatures predict for outcome risk within 5 years of diagnosis. Predictors of late risk for HR positive disease are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.