Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21597380›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2011

Predictors and risk model development for menopausal age in fragile X premutation carriers.

Marian A Spath, Ton B Feuth, Arie P T Smits, Helger G Yntema, Didi D M Braat, Chris M G Thomas, Ad Geurts van Kessel, Stephanie L Sherman, Emily G Allen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Refining the risk for fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI) by FMR1 CGG repeat size.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  6. Reproductive Longevity and Aging: Geroscience Approaches to Maintain Long-Term Ovarian Fitness.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Laboratory testing for fragile X, 2021 revision: a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  8. IsFrontiers in psychiatry · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Data-driven phenotype discovery ofScience advances · 2019
    Article
  16. CGG repeat length and AGG interruptions as indicators of fragile X-associated diminished ovarian reserve.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marian A SpathDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. M.Spath@obgyn.umcn.nl
Ton B Feuth
Arie P T Smits
Helger G Yntema
Didi D M Braat
Chris M G Thomas
Ad Geurts van Kessel
Stephanie L Sherman
Emily G Allen
Institute of Human Genetics · PLEmory University · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Genetics Epidemiology of the FMR1 GeneR01HD029909 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SHERMAN, STEPHANIE L. · 1994 to 2009
$6.1M
TRANSCRIPTION AND RNA BINDING IN FRAGILE X SYNDROMEP01HD035576 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI WARREN, STEPHEN T. · 1997 to 2005
$5.0M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD035576NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD35576NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD029909NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD29909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWomen who carry a fragile X mental retardation 1 premutation are at risk for fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency and should be counseled for a potentially reduced fertility. Multiple factors can affect the age of onset and severity of fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency. In this study, we assessed the predictive power of several factors with menopausal age, a surrogate measure of onset of fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency.

methodsGenetic, environmental, and reproductive factors were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard models in 1068 women, 385 of fragile X families ascertained through the Nijmegen study and 683 of fragile X families or general population families ascertained through the Atlanta study.

resultsThe highest association with menopausal age among fragile X mental retardation 1 premutation carriers was found for risk index by CGG repeat size (hazard ratio, 1.43) and smoking (hazard ratio, 1.34). Women from the Nijmegen cohort showed an overall lower age at menopause onset, for which a correction was made. A prediction model based on these two parameters, mean menopausal age of first-degree relatives with the same mutation status and the correction for ascertainment site, estimated the probability of becoming postmenopausal for premutation carriers, with a margin of 7-10%.

conclusionWe conclude that this model serves as a first step toward clinical application of fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency prediction.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsBase SequenceCohort StudiesFamily HealthFemaleFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Fragile X SyndromeGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHeterozygoteHumansMenopauseMiddle AgedMutationFMR1 protein, humanFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1

Identifiers

PMID21597380
PMCPMC3132284
OpenAlexW2150218407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.