Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21597368›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cardiology2011

Medication adherence: emerging use of technology.

Bradi B Granger, Hayden B Bosworth

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cardiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03022266 (A Behavioral Economics-Based Telehealth Intervention to Improve Post-MI Medication Adherence), which is not on this map. Cited by 70 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03022266 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Behavioral Economics-Based Telehealth Intervention to Improve Post-MI Medication Adherence

TypeinterventionalSponsorWellth Inc.Ran2017 to 2018Enrolled130ConditionsMyocardial Infarction, Acute, Myocardial InfarctionArmsFinancial Incentive and Mobile Phone App
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Adherence to Chronic Therapies: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation of Telephone-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Services Delivered to Adults 65 and Older During the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bradi B GrangerDuke Translational Nursing Institute, Duke University School of Nursing, Duke Heart Center and Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina 27503, USA. grang004@mc.duke.edu
Hayden B Bosworth

Funding

Pilot Project for the DTMI CRA ProgramUL1RR024128 · NCRR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CALIFF, ROBERT M · 2006 to 2010
$48.1M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024128NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAdherence to proven, effective medications remains low, resulting in high rates of clinical complications, hospital readmissions, and death. The use of technology to identify patients at risk and to target interventions for poor adherence has increased. This review focuses on research that tests these emerging technologies and evaluates the effect of technology-based adherence interventions on cardiovascular outcomes. RECENT

findingsRecent studies have evaluated technology-based interventions to improve medication adherence by using pharmaceutical databases, tailoring educational information to individual patient needs, delivering technology-driven reminders to patients and providers, and integrating in-person interventions with electronic alerts. Cellular phone reminders and in-home electronic technology used to communicate reminder messages have shown mixed results. Only one study has shown improvement in both adherence and clinical outcome. Current trials suggest that increasing automated reminders will complement but not replace the benefits seen with in-person communication for medication taking. SUMMARY: Integration of in-person contacts with technology-driven medication adherence reminders, electronic medication reconciliation, and pharmaceutical databases may improve medication adherence and have a positive effect on cardiovascular clinical outcomes. Opportunities for providers to monitor the quality of care based on new adherence research are evolving and may be useful as standards for quality improvement emerge.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceReminder SystemsCardiovascular DiseasesCell PhoneDatabases, FactualElectronic MailHumansPatient SatisfactionPractice Guidelines as TopicSelf Care

Identifiers

PMID21597368
PMCPMC3756138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.