Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21597104›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Mapping clinical phenotype data elements to standardized metadata repositories and controlled terminologies: the eMERGE Network experience.

Jyotishman Pathak, Janey Wang, Sudha Kashyap, Melissa Basford, Rongling Li, Daniel R Masys, Christopher G Chute

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Understanding the Nature of Metadata: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. CDEMapper: enhancing National Institutes of Health common data element use with large language models.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Role of Electronic Health Records in Advancing Genomic Medicine.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2021
    Review
  16. High-throughput phenotyping with temporal sequences.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Facilitating phenotype transfer using a common data model.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Examining the Needs of Patient Stakeholders as Research Partners in Health Data Networks for Translational Research.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019
    Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jyotishman PathakDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. pathak.jyotishman@mayo.edu
Janey Wang
Sudha Kashyap
Melissa Basford
Rongling Li
Daniel R Masys
Christopher G Chute

Funding

Vanderbilt Genome-Electronic Records ProjectU01HG004603 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI RODEN, DAN M · 2007 to 2011
$7.3M
Development and Use of Network Infrastructure for High-Throughput GWA StudiesU01HG004610 · NHGRI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI LARSON, ERIC B · 2007 to 2010
$4.2M
EMR Phenotypes and Community Engaged Genomic AssociationsU01HG004599 · NHGRI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CHUTE, CHRISTOPHER G · 2007 to 2010
$3.7M
Genome-wide Studies from the NUgene BiorespositoryU01HG004609 · NHGRI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CHISHOLM, REX L · 2007 to 2010
$3.7M
Genome-Wide Study of Cataract and Low HDL in the Personalized Medicine Research PU01HG004608 · NHGRI · MARSHFIELD CLINIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI MCCARTY, CATHERINE ANNE · 2007 to 2010
$3.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004599NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004603NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004608NHGRI NIH HHS U01-HG-004608NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004609NHGRI NIH HHS U01HG004609NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004610NHGRI NIH HHS U01-HG-004610NHGRI NIH HHS U01-HG-04599NHGRI NIH HHS U01-HG-04603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystematic study of clinical phenotypes is important for a better understanding of the genetic basis of human diseases and more effective gene-based disease management. A key aspect in facilitating such studies requires standardized representation of the phenotype data using common data elements (CDEs) and controlled biomedical vocabularies. In this study, the authors analyzed how a limited subset of phenotypic data is amenable to common definition and standardized collection, as well as how their adoption in large-scale epidemiological and genome-wide studies can significantly facilitate cross-study analysis.

methodsThe authors mapped phenotype data dictionaries from five different eMERGE (Electronic Medical Records and Genomics) Network sites studying multiple diseases such as peripheral arterial disease and type 2 diabetes. For mapping, standardized terminological and metadata repository resources, such as the caDSR (Cancer Data Standards Registry and Repository) and SNOMED CT (Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine), were used. The mapping process comprised both lexical (via searching for relevant pre-coordinated concepts and data elements) and semantic (via post-coordination) techniques. Where feasible, new data elements were curated to enhance the coverage during mapping. A web-based application was also developed to uniformly represent and query the mapped data elements from different eMERGE studies.

resultsApproximately 60% of the target data elements (95 out of 157) could be mapped using simple lexical analysis techniques on pre-coordinated terms and concepts before any additional curation of terminology and metadata resources was initiated by eMERGE investigators. After curation of 54 new caDSR CDEs and nine new NCI thesaurus concepts and using post-coordination, the authors were able to map the remaining 40% of data elements to caDSR and SNOMED CT. A web-based tool was also implemented to assist in semi-automatic mapping of data elements.

conclusionThis study emphasizes the requirement for standardized representation of clinical research data using existing metadata and terminology resources and provides simple techniques and software for data element mapping using experiences from the eMERGE Network.

Indexed as

Database Management SystemsDatabases, GeneticElectronic Health RecordsVocabulary, ControlledComputational BiologyData MiningHumansInformation DisseminationPhenotypeTranslational Research, BiomedicalUnited States

Identifiers

PMID21597104
PMCPMC3128396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.