ArticleNucleic acids research2011
Biological insights from topology independent comparison of protein 3D structures.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lethal effects of ivermectin structures on malaria vectors and in silico analysis of interactions with their glutamate-gated chloride ion channels.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- ATP-Driven Allosteric Regulation of 14-3-3: Positive Modulation of ATP Hydrolysis and Negative Regulation of Peptide Binding.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025Article
- epLSAP-Align: a non-sequential protein structural alignment solver with entropy-regularized partial linear sum assignment problem formulation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Charting Peptide Shared Sequences Between 'Diabetes-Viruses' and Human Pancreatic Proteins, Their Structural and Autoimmune Implications.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2024Article
- Creative destruction: New protein folds from old.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Fold Evolution before LUCA: Common Ancestry of SH3 Domains and OB Domains.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Methods for Molecular Modelling of Protein Complexes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Review
- AppA: a web server for analysis, comparison, and visualization of contact residues and interfacial waters of antibody-antigen structures and models.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- The three-dimensional structure of an H-superfamily conotoxin reveals a granulin fold arising from a common ICK cysteine framework.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019Article
- Simulations of mutant p53 DNA binding domains reveal a novel druggable pocket.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Non-sequential protein structure alignment by conformational space annealing and local refinement.PloS one · 2019Article
- De novo main-chain modeling for EM maps using MAINMAST.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Article
- Nup358 binds to AGO proteins through its SUMO-interacting motifs and promotes the association of target mRNA with miRISC.EMBO reports · 2017Article
- Topology independent comparison of RNA 3D structures using the CLICK algorithm.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- General overview on structure prediction of twilight-zone proteins.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2015Review
- Structure- and context-based analysis of the GxGYxYP family reveals a new putative class of glycoside hydrolase.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Depth: a web server to compute depth, cavity sizes, detect potential small-molecule ligand-binding cavities and predict the pKa of ionizable residues in proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- Detection of spatial correlations in protein structures and molecular complexes.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2012Article
- CLICK--topology-independent comparison of biomolecular 3D structures.Nucleic acids research · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comparing and classifying the three-dimensional (3D) structures of proteins is of crucial importance to molecular biology, from helping to determine the function of a protein to determining its evolutionary relationships. Traditionally, 3D structures are classified into groups of families that closely resemble the grouping according to their primary sequence. However, significant structural similarities exist at multiple levels between proteins that belong to these different structural families. In this study, we propose a new algorithm, CLICK, to capture such similarities. The method optimally superimposes a pair of protein structures independent of topology. Amino acid residues are represented by the Cartesian coordinates of a representative point (usually the C(α) atom), side chain solvent accessibility, and secondary structure. Structural comparison is effected by matching cliques of points. CLICK was extensively benchmarked for alignment accuracy on four different sets: (i) 9537 pair-wise alignments between two structures with the same topology; (ii) 64 alignments from set (i) that were considered to constitute difficult alignment cases; (iii) 199 pair-wise alignments between proteins with similar structure but different topology; and (iv) 1275 pair-wise alignments of RNA structures. The accuracy of CLICK alignments was measured by the average structure overlap score and compared with other alignment methods, including HOMSTRAD, MUSTANG, Geometric Hashing, SALIGN, DALI, GANGSTA(+), FATCAT, ARTS and SARA. On average, CLICK produces pair-wise alignments that are either comparable or statistically significantly more accurate than all of these other methods. We have used CLICK to uncover relationships between (previously) unrelated proteins. These new biological insights include: (i) detecting hinge regions in proteins where domain or sub-domains show flexibility; (ii) discovering similar small molecule binding sites from proteins of different folds and (iii) discovering topological variants of known structural/sequence motifs. Our method can generally be applied to compare any pair of molecular structures represented in Cartesian coordinates as exemplified by the RNA structure superimposition benchmark.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.