Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21595960›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2011

Toward an interactive article: integrating journals and biological databases.

Arun Rangarajan, Tim Schedl, Karen Yook, Juancarlos Chan, Stephen Haenel, Lolly Otis, Sharon Faelten, Tracey DePellegrin-Connelly, Ruth Isaacson, Marek S Skrzypek and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Opportunities for text mining in the FlyBase genetic literature curation workflow.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Arun RangarajanDivision of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Tim Schedl
Karen Yook
Juancarlos Chan
Stephen Haenel
Lolly Otis
Sharon Faelten
Tracey DePellegrin-Connelly
Ruth Isaacson
Marek S Skrzypek
Steven J Marygold
Raymund Stefancsik
J Michael Cherry
Paul W Sternberg
Hans-Michael Müller
California Institute of Technology · USDartmouth College · USGenetics Society of America · USStanford University · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USPilgrim Psychiatric Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

FLYBASE: A DROSOPHILA RELATIONAL DATABASEP41HG000739 · NHGRI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI GELBART, WILLIAM MARTIN · 1992 to 2014
$56.6M
Wormbase SupplementP41HG002223 · NHGRI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI STERNBERG, PAUL WARREN · 2000 to 2012
$32.0M
GENOMIC DATABASE FOR THE YEAST SACCHAROMYCESP41HG001315 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHERRY, J. MICHAEL · 1995 to 2010
$27.1M
WormBase: a core data resource for C. elegans and other nematodesU24HG002223 · NHGRI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI TIM SCHEDL, PAUL Warren STERNBERG · 2018 to 2026
$18.9M
Stem cell proliferation / meiosis decision in C. elegansR01GM063310 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHEDL, TIM · 2001 to 2008
$3.2M
Textpresso: information retrieval and extraction system for biological literatureR01HG004090 · NHGRI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MULLER, HANS-MICHAEL · 2006 to 2012
$2.1M
MPK -1 ERK SUBSTRATES AND THE CONTROL OF GERMLINE DEVELOPMENTR01GM085150 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHEDL, TIM · 2008 to 2011
$1.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG000739NHGRI NIH HHS P41-HG001315NHGRI NIH HHS P41-HG002223NHGRI NIH HHS R01- HG004090NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG002223NIGMS NIH HHS GM085150NIGMS NIH HHS GM63310NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJournal articles and databases are two major modes of communication in the biological sciences, and thus integrating these critical resources is of urgent importance to increase the pace of discovery. Projects focused on bridging the gap between journals and databases have been on the rise over the last five years and have resulted in the development of automated tools that can recognize entities within a document and link those entities to a relevant database. Unfortunately, automated tools cannot resolve ambiguities that arise from one term being used to signify entities that are quite distinct from one another. Instead, resolving these ambiguities requires some manual oversight. Finding the right balance between the speed and portability of automation and the accuracy and flexibility of manual effort is a crucial goal to making text markup a successful venture.

resultsWe have established a journal article mark-up pipeline that links GENETICS journal articles and the model organism database (MOD) WormBase. This pipeline uses a lexicon built with entities from the database as a first step. The entity markup pipeline results in links from over nine classes of objects including genes, proteins, alleles, phenotypes and anatomical terms. New entities and ambiguities are discovered and resolved by a database curator through a manual quality control (QC) step, along with help from authors via a web form that is provided to them by the journal. New entities discovered through this pipeline are immediately sent to an appropriate curator at the database. Ambiguous entities that do not automatically resolve to one link are resolved by hand ensuring an accurate link. This pipeline has been extended to other databases, namely Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) and FlyBase, and has been implemented in marking up a paper with links to multiple databases.

conclusionsOur semi-automated pipeline hyperlinks articles published in GENETICS to model organism databases such as WormBase. Our pipeline results in interactive articles that are data rich with high accuracy. The use of a manual quality control step sets this pipeline apart from other hyperlinking tools and results in benefits to authors, journals, readers and databases.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualPeriodicals as TopicAnimalsBiologyCaenorhabditis elegansDatabases, GeneticInternetQuality Control

Identifiers

PMID21595960
PMCPMC3213741
OpenAlexW2086104943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.