ArticleBMC health services research2011
Development of modelling method selection tool for health services management: from problem structuring methods to modelling and simulation methods.
Article in BMC health services research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Managing patient fears around bariatric surgery: a qualitative study of communication differences between high- and low-referring primary care providers.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Bringing evolutionary cancer therapy to the clinic: a systems approach.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Review
- Criteria-based outpatient scheduling at a nephrology clinic: prospective evaluation of patient pre-assessment and its corresponding adaptive scheduling strategy.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Development and field testing of a standardised goal setting package for person-centred discharge care planning in stroke.PEC innovation · 2022Article
- Discrete-Event Simulation Modeling in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Variation in referral rates to emergency departments and inpatient services from a GP out of hours service and the potential impact of alternative staffing models.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2021Article
- Overview and Use of Tools for Selecting Modelling Techniques in Health Economic Studies.PharmacoEconomics · 2021Review
- Review
- Evaluating stakeholder involvement in building a decision support tool for NHS health checks: co-producing the WorkHORSE study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Work system barriers and facilitators in inpatient care transitions of pediatric trauma patients.Applied ergonomics · 2020Article
- Capacity and patient flow planning in post-term pregnancy outpatient clinics: a computer simulation modelling study.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Economic efficiency versus accessibility: Planning of the hospital landscape in rural regions using a linear model on the example of paediatric and obstetric wards in the northeast of Germany.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Analysis of the effects of EHR implementation on timeliness of care in a dermatology clinic: a simulation study.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Article
- Unpicking the Gordian knot: a systems approach to traumatic brain injury care in low-income and middle-income countries.BMJ global health · 2018Article
- Optimizing appointment template and number of staff of an OB/GYN clinic--micro and macro simulation analyses.BMC health services research · 2015Article
- Articulating current service development practices: a qualitative analysis of eleven mental health projects.BMC health services research · 2014Article
- On the improvement of blood sample collection at clinical laboratories.BMC health services research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is an increasing recognition that modelling and simulation can assist in the process of designing health care policies, strategies and operations. However, the current use is limited and answers to questions such as what methods to use and when remain somewhat underdeveloped.
aimThe aim of this study is to provide a mechanism for decision makers in health services planning and management to compare a broad range of modelling and simulation methods so that they can better select and use them or better commission relevant modelling and simulation work.
methodsThis paper proposes a modelling and simulation method comparison and selection tool developed from a comprehensive literature review, the research team's extensive expertise and inputs from potential users. Twenty-eight different methods were identified, characterised by their relevance to different application areas, project life cycle stages, types of output and levels of insight, and four input resources required (time, money, knowledge and data).
resultsThe characterisation is presented in matrix forms to allow quick comparison and selection. This paper also highlights significant knowledge gaps in the existing literature when assessing the applicability of particular approaches to health services management, where modelling and simulation skills are scarce let alone money and time.
conclusionsA modelling and simulation method comparison and selection tool is developed to assist with the selection of methods appropriate to supporting specific decision making processes. In particular it addresses the issue of which method is most appropriate to which specific health services management problem, what the user might expect to be obtained from the method, and what is required to use the method. In summary, we believe the tool adds value to the scarce existing literature on methods comparison and selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.