Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21594933›Full record

ArticleRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM2011

Selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mass spectrometry without isotope labeling can be used for rapid protein quantification.

Wenbo Zhi, Meiyao Wang, Jin-Xiong She

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Proteomics progresses in microbial physiology and clinical antimicrobial therapy.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Arabidopsis peroxisome proteomics.Frontiers in plant science · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenbo ZhiCenter for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Georgia Health Sciences University, 1120 15th Street, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Meiyao Wang
Jin-Xiong She

Funding

Studies of the Immunopathogenesis of Type 1 DiabetesR01HD037800 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SHE, JIN-XIONG · 1999 to 2006
$4.6M
Proteomic changes/progression of human type 1 diabetesR33HD050196 · NICHD · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI SHE, JIN-XIONG · 2006 to 2008
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS 2R01HD37800NICHD NIH HHS 4R33HD050196NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD037800NICHD NIH HHS R33 HD050196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The validation of putative biomarker candidates has become the major bottle-neck in protein biomarker development. Conventional immunoaffinity methods are limited by the availability of antibodies and kits. Here we demonstrate the feasibility of using selected reaction monitoring (SRM) without isotope labeling to achieve fast and reproducible quantification of serum proteins. The SRM/MRM assays for three standard serum proteins, including ceruloplasmin (CP), serum aymloid A (SAA) and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), have good linear ranges, generally 10(3) to 10(4) . There are almost perfect correlations between SRM intensities and the loaded peptide amounts (R(2) is usually ~0.99). Our data suggest that SRM/MRM is able to quantify proteins within the range of 0.2-2 fmol, which is comparable to the commercial ELISA/LUMINEX kits for these proteins. Excellent correlations between SRM/MRM and ELISA/LUMINEX assays were observed for SAA and SHBG (R(2)=0.928 and 0.851, respectively). However, the correlation between SRM/MRM and ELISA for CP is less desirable (R(2)=0.565). The reproducibility for SRM/MRM assays is generally very good but may depend on the proteins/peptides being analyzed (R(2)=0.931 and 0.882 for SAA and SHBG, and 0.723 for CP). The SRM/MRM assay without isotope labeling is a rapid and useful method for protein biomarker validation in a modest number of samples and is especially useful when other assays such as ELISA or LUMINEX are not available.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBiomarkersBlood ProteinsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansLinear ModelsMass SpectrometryMolecular Sequence DataReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkersBlood Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21594933
PMCPMC4121859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.