Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21594550›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2011

Hemangiomas revisited: the useful, the unusual and the new. Part 1: overview and clinical and imaging characteristics.

Ricardo Restrepo, Rajaneeshankar Palani, Luisa F Cervantes, Ana-Margarita Duarte, Ibrahim Amjad, Nolan R Altman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Palpable pediatric chest wall masses.Pediatric radiology · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Imaging Pediatric Vascular Lesions.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2015
    Review
  16. Giant cranial and cerebellar hemangioma treated with propranolol.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2015
    Article
  17. Update on the classification of hemangioma.Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ricardo RestrepoDepartment of Radiology, Miami Children's Hospital, 3100 SW 62nd St., Miami, FL 33155-3009, USA. Ricardo.Restrepo@mch.com
Rajaneeshankar Palani
Luisa F Cervantes
Ana-Margarita Duarte
Ibrahim Amjad
Nolan R Altman
Miami Children's Hospital · USTexas Plastic Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemangiomas are common vascular tumors occurring in children. Though most of the lesions present in infants and young children with a typical appearance, it is important to understand that they all do not behave in the same way. Rather, they are a group of vascular lesions with different clinico-pathological subtypes, with their clinical behavior varying with the stage of the tumor as well. As such, they can and do have a varied clinical, imaging and pathological appearance according to the location of the tumor and also the stage at which the patient is seen. In this pictorial essay, the classification, pathogenesis, clinical appearance, natural history and imaging characteristics of hemangiomas are reviewed and illustrated.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingAlgorithmsChildChild, PreschoolContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialHemangiomaHumansInfantInfant, NewbornContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID21594550
OpenAlexW1564306954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.