Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21593992›Full record

ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2010

Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics: Biological and Technological Aspects.

Yuliya V Karpievitch, Ashoka D Polpitiya, Gordon A Anderson, Richard D Smith, Alan R Dabney

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04843865 (A Systemic Approach to Study the Traditional Chinese Medicine as an Adjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04843865 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Systemic Approach to Study the Traditional Chinese Medicine as an Adjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiti Tunku Abdul RahmanRan2022 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsBreast Cancer, Musculoskeletal PainArmsChinese Herbs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The cancer microbiome.Advances in clinical chemistry · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. First Insight into the Degradome ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuliya V KarpievitchPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352.
Ashoka D Polpitiya
Gordon A Anderson
Richard D Smith
Alan R Dabney

Funding

WORKSHOP AND TRAINING ACTIVITIESP41RR018522 · NCRR · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI SMITH, RICHARD D · 2003 to 2011
$25.1M
Nutrition, Biostatistics and BioinformaticsR25CA090301 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM · PI CARROLL, RAYMOND J. · 2001 to 2015
$7.6M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA090301NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR018522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics has become the tool of choice for identifying and quantifying the proteome of an organism. Though recent years have seen a tremendous improvement in instrument performance and the computational tools used, significant challenges remain, and there are many opportunities for statisticians to make important contributions. In the most widely used "bottom-up" approach to proteomics, complex mixtures of proteins are first subjected to enzymatic cleavage, the resulting peptide products are separated based on chemical or physical properties and analyzed using a mass spectrometer. The two fundamental challenges in the analysis of bottom-up MS-based proteomics are: (1) Identifying the proteins that are present in a sample, and (2) Quantifying the abundance levels of the identified proteins. Both of these challenges require knowledge of the biological and technological context that gives rise to observed data, as well as the application of sound statistical principles for estimation and inference. We present an overview of bottom-up proteomics and outline the key statistical issues that arise in protein identification and quantification.

Identifiers

PMID21593992
PMCPMC3095207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.