Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21593799›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2011

Response of methanotrophic communities to afforestation and reforestation in New Zealand.

Loïc Nazaries, Kevin R Tate, Des J Ross, Jagrati Singh, John Dando, Surinder Saggar, Elizabeth M Baggs, Peter Millard, J Colin Murrell, Brajesh K Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microbial oxidation significantly reduces methane export from global groundwaters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Methane cycling in temperate forests.Carbon balance and management · 2024
    Review
  4. Characterizing the post-monsoon COEnvironmental monitoring and assessment · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Disproportionate CHMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Loïc NazariesThe James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, UK.
Kevin R Tate
Des J Ross
Jagrati Singh
John Dando
Surinder Saggar
Elizabeth M Baggs
Peter Millard
J Colin Murrell
Brajesh K Singh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methanotrophs use methane (CH(4)) as a carbon source. They are particularly active in temperate forest soils. However, the rate of change of CH(4) oxidation in soil with afforestation or reforestation is poorly understood. Here, soil CH(4) oxidation was examined in New Zealand volcanic soils under regenerating native forests following burning, and in a mature native forest. Results were compared with data for pasture to pine land-use change at nearby sites. We show that following soil disturbance, as little as 47 years may be needed for development of a stable methanotrophic community similar to that in the undisturbed native forest soil. Corresponding soil CH(4)-oxidation rates in the regenerating forest soil have the potential to reach those of the mature forest, but climo-edaphic fators appear limiting. The observed changes in CH(4)-oxidation rate were directly linked to a prior shift in methanotrophic communities, which suggests microbial control of the terrestrial CH(4) flux and identifies the need to account for this response to afforestation and reforestation in global prediction of CH(4) emission.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyClimate ChangeMethaneNew ZealandOxidation-ReductionSoilTreesVolcanic EruptionsMethaneSoil

Identifiers

PMID21593799
PMCPMC3197171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.