ArticleBMC public health2011
Challenging the role of social norms regarding body weight as an explanation for weight, height, and BMI misreporting biases: development and application of a new approach to examining misreporting and misclassification bias in surveys.
Article in BMC public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reliability of Self-Reported Height and Weight in Children: A School-Based Cross-Sectional Study and a Review.Nutrients · 2022Pooled it
- Dietary Quality Changes According to the Preceding Maximum Weight: A Longitudinal Analysis in the PREDIMED-Plus Randomized Trial.Nutrients · 2020Trial
- Self-reported height and weight: timeliness and source of the participant information.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Determinants of reliability of self-reported height and weight and their impact on medication dosing: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2025Observational
- How tall am I again? A longitudinal analysis of the reliability of self-reported height.SSM - population health · 2023Article
- Coronavirus Disease 2019 Severity in Obese Patients May Be Linked to Viral Load and Immune Response.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Article
- Use and reporting of Bland-Altman analyses in studies of self-reported versus measured weight and height.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2020Article
- Validity assessment of self-reported weight and its correction process among Mexican adult women of reproductive age.PloS one · 2020Article
- Extreme under-reporting of body weight by young adults with obesity: relation to social desirability.Obesity science & practice · 2018Article
- Validity of self-reported weight, height, and BMI in mothers of the research Birth in Brazil.Revista de saude publica · 2017Article
- Body image satisfaction and weight concerns among a Mediterranean adult population.BMC public health · 2017Article
- A feasibility study to assess the validity of administrative data sources and self-reported information of breast cancer survivors.Israel journal of health policy research · 2016Observational
- Gender comparisons of physical fitness indexes in Inner Mongolia medical students in China.Global journal of health science · 2014Article
- How accurate is web-based self-reported height, weight, and body mass index in young adults?Journal of medical Internet research · 2014Article
- Self-reporting and measurement of body mass index in adolescents: refusals and validity, and the possible role of socioeconomic and health-related factors.BMC public health · 2013Article
- Temporal changes in bias of body mass index scores based on self-reported height and weight.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2013Article
- Measuring the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in a community-based sample of young people.BMC medical research methodology · 2012Article
- Misreporting Weight and Height Among Mexican and Puerto Rican Men.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCultural pressures to be thin and tall are postulated to cause people to misreport their body weight and height towards more socially normative (i.e., desirable) values, but a paucity of direct evidence supports this idea. We developed a novel non-linear approach to examining weight, height, and BMI misreporting biases and used this approach to examine the association between socially non-normative weight and misreporting biases in adults.
methodsThe Survey of Lifestyles, Attitudes, and Nutrition 2007 (SLÁN 2007), a nationally representative survey of the Republic of Ireland (N = 1942 analyzed) was used. Self-reported weight (height) was classified as under-reported by ≥ 2.0 kg (2.0 cm), over-reported by ≥ 2.0 kg (2.0 cm), or accurately reported within 2.0 kg (2.0 cm) to account for technical errors of measurement and short-term fluctuations in measured weight (height). A simulation strategy was used to define self-report-based BMI as under-estimated by more than 1.40 kg/m2, over-estimated by more than 1.40 kg/m2, or accurately estimated within 1.40 kg/m2. Patterns of biases in self-reported weight, height, and BMI were explored. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with mis-estimated BMI and to calculate adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 99% confidence intervals (99%CI).
resultsThe patterns of bias contributing the most to BMI mis-estimation were consistently, in decreasing order of influence, (1) under-reported weight combined with over-reported height, (2) under-reported weight with accurately reported height, and (3) accurately reported weight with over-reported height. Average bias in self-report-based BMI was -1.34 kg/m2 overall and -0.49, -1.33, and -2.66 kg/m2 in normal, overweight, and obese categories, respectively. Despite the increasing degree of bias with progressively higher BMI categories, persons describing themselves as too heavy were, within any given BMI category, less likely to have under-estimated BMI (AOR 0.5, 99%CI: 0.3-0.8, P < 0.001), to be misclassified in a lower BMI category (AOR 0.3, 99%CI: 0.2-0.5, P < 0.001), to under-report weight (AOR 0.5, 99%CI: 0.3-0.7, P < 0.001), and to over-report height (OR 0.7, 99%CI: 0.6-1.0, P = 0.007).
conclusionsA novel non-linear approach to examining weight, height, and BMI misreporting biases was developed. Perceiving oneself as too heavy appears to reduce rather than exacerbate weight, height, and BMI misreporting biases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.