SynthesisBMC medicine2011
Do hospitalist physicians improve the quality of inpatient care delivery? A systematic review of process, efficiency and outcome measures.
Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions to Reduce Hospital Length of Stay in High-risk Populations: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2021Pooled it
- The crisis of internal medicine in Italy: responsibility without authority.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Adapting the Hospitalist Work Style to Japan's Work Style Reform: A Qualitative Study from the Perspectives of Japan-Trained Hospitalists in the United States.JMA journal · 2026Article
- Feasibility and early outcomes of a multi-site TeleHospitalist admissions programme: staff and patient perspectives from a large health system.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Impact of skilled nursing facility discharge on inpatient oncology quality outcomes.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2025Article
- Generalist-led hospital models and their alignment with value-based care: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- The Evaluation of Hospitalist Care for Patients with Aspiration Pneumonia Using Risk-adjusted Performance Indicators Developed from a Nationwide Inpatient Database.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Current Status of Hospitalist Practice and Factors Influencing Job Satisfaction in Korea.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- A Classification Method for General Medicine Physicians to Advance Field Research in Japan.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Pseudogout in an Acute-care Hospital: Hospitalists as the Key to Optimized Care.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2025Article
- Why the NHS needs adult generalists: A call for single certification in general internal medicine.Future healthcare journal · 2024Article
- Implementation of Medical Hospitalist Care at a Korean Tertiary Hospital: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Standardizing Generalist Definitions to Improve Evidence in General Medicine: Addressing Diverse Interpretations and Lack of Consistency.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Should primary care physicians consult on their admitted patients? A single-center survey study.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2024Article
- How Do We Establish the Utility and Evidence of General Medicine in Japan?International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Impact of hospitalist care model on patient outcomes in acute medical unit: a retrospective cohort study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- A National Survey of the Infrastructure and Scope of Practice for Gastroenterology Hospitalists.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Article
- Comparing Japanese University Hospitals' and Community Healthcare Facilities' Research Contributions on PubMed.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- Best practices during COVID-19 pandemic in solid organ transplant programs in Spain.Transplantation reviews (Orlando, Fla.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite more than a decade of research on hospitalists and their performance, disagreement still exists regarding whether and how hospital-based physicians improve the quality of inpatient care delivery. This systematic review summarizes the findings from 65 comparative evaluations to determine whether hospitalists provide a higher quality of inpatient care relative to traditional inpatient physicians who maintain hospital privileges with concurrent outpatient practices.
methodsArticles on hospitalist performance published between January 1996 and December 2010 were identified through MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index, CINAHL, NHS Economic Evaluation Database and a hand-search of reference lists, key journals and editorials. Comparative evaluations presenting original, quantitative data on processes, efficiency or clinical outcome measures of care between hospitalists, community-based physicians and traditional academic attending physicians were included (n = 65). After proposing a conceptual framework for evaluating inpatient physician performance, major findings on quality are summarized according to their percentage change, direction and statistical significance.
resultsThe majority of reviewed articles demonstrated that hospitalists are efficient providers of inpatient care on the basis of reductions in their patients' average length of stay (69%) and total hospital costs (70%); however, the clinical quality of hospitalist care appears to be comparable to that provided by their colleagues. The methodological quality of hospitalist evaluations remains a concern and has not improved over time. Persistent issues include insufficient reporting of source or sample populations (n = 30), patients lost to follow-up (n = 42) and estimates of effect or random variability (n = 35); inappropriate use of statistical tests (n = 55); and failure to adjust for established confounders (n = 37).
conclusionsFuture research should include an expanded focus on the specific structures of care that differentiate hospitalists from other inpatient physician groups as well as the development of better conceptual and statistical models that identify and measure underlying mechanisms driving provider-outcome associations in quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.