ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2011
Paracetamol prescribing in primary care: too little and too much?
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fever and Pain in Italian Children: What Pediatricians Really Do.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A survey of medicine use in children and adolescents in Austria.European journal of pediatrics · 2018Article
- Fever and Pain Management in Childhood: Healthcare Providers' and Parents' Adherence to Current Recommendations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016Article
- Acetaminophen administration in pediatric age: an observational prospective cross-sectional study.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2016Observational
- Identifying adults at risk of paracetamol toxicity in the acute dental setting: development of a clinical algorithm.British dental journal · 2014Article
- Off-label medicine use in children and adolescents: results of a population-based study in Germany.BMC public health · 2013Article
- [Drug prescriptions study in the outpatient setting: assessment of off-label uses in children].Atencion primariaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo assess the level of paracetamol off label prescribing in the community and the potential for paracetamol under or overdosing.
methodsThe Scottish Practice Team Information (PTI) database containing prescribing data for approximately 35,839 children aged (0-12 years) was analysed for paracetamol prescriptions for the year 2006. Off label prescribing was defined as prescribing outside the BNFc age and dose recommendations.
resultsTwo thousand seven hundred and sixty-one children aged 0-12 years were issued with 4423 prescriptions for paracetamol. (1446 males). Children 1-5 years (1329, 42.2%) accounted for 48.9% (2164) of all paracetamol prescriptions. Eighteen per cent (793) of individual prescriptions were off label and after accounting for repeat prescriptions 625 (22.75%) individuals were exposed to off label prescriptions. A further 15% (668) of prescriptions contained insufficient dosage data to determine their status, 13.3% (368) being underdosed and 4.4% (121) overdosed at least once during the study year. In total 11.3% (502) of all prescriptions were classified as underdose, 2.9% (127) as overdose and 15% (667) had no dosage instructions. Age was significantly related to non recommended dosage (χ(2) test, P < 0.001). Children 1-3 months old were at highest risk of being overdosed; 27% of prescriptions recommended actual or potential overdosage and 25% (354) of children aged 6-12 years were prescribed an actual or potential underdose. Overall 57.2% of all prescriptions failed to comply with current BNFc recommendations.
conclusionParacetamol off label prescribing is common in primary care, with relatively high levels of potential overdosing in the youngest children and potential underdosing in the oldest children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.