ArticlePloS one2011
An ecological study of the determinants of differences in 2009 pandemic influenza mortality rates between countries in Europe.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The association between socioeconomic status and pandemic influenza: Systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Spatiotemporal patterns of influenza incidence changes in mainland China, 2004-2020.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Spatio-temporal evolution patterns of influenza incidence and its nonlinear spatial correlation with environmental pollutants in China.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Inequality, public health, and COVID-19: an analysis of the Spanish case by municipalities.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023Article
- Statistical model for factors correlating with COVID-19 deaths.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2022Article
- Demography, inequalities and Global Health Security Index as correlates of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality.The International journal of health planning and management · 2022Article
- Socioeconomic, demographic and healthcare determinants of the COVID-19 pandemic: an ecological study of Spain.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Country-level determinants of the severity of the first global wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: an ecological study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- An ecological study of socioeconomic predictors in detection of COVID-19 cases across neighborhoods in New York City.BMC medicine · 2020Article
- Article
- Cross-Country Comparisons of Covid-19: Policy, Politics and the Price of Life.Environmental & resource economics · 2020Article
- Liver Cancer Disparities in New York City: A Neighborhood View of Risk and Harm Reduction Factors.Frontiers in oncology · 2018Article
- Possible explanations for why some countries were harder hit by the pandemic influenza virus in 2009 - a global mortality impact modeling study.BMC infectious diseases · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPandemic A (H1N1) 2009 mortality rates varied widely from one country to another. Our aim was to identify potential socioeconomic determinants of pandemic mortality and explain between-country variation. METHODOLOGY: Based on data from a total of 30 European countries, we applied random-effects Poisson regression models to study the relationship between pandemic mortality rates (May 2009 to May 2010) and a set of representative environmental, health care-associated, economic and demographic country-level parameters. The study was completed by June 2010. PRINCIPAL
findingsMost regression approaches indicated a consistent, statistically significant inverse association between pandemic influenza-related mortality and per capita government expenditure on health. The findings were similar in univariable [coefficient: -0.00028, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -0.00046, -0.00010, p = 0.002] and multivariable analyses (including all covariates, coefficient: -0.00107, 95% CI: -0.00196, -0.00018, p = 0.018). The estimate was barely insignificant when the multivariable model included only significant covariates from the univariate step (coefficient: -0.00046, 95% CI: -0.00095, 0.00003, p = 0.063).
conclusionsOur findings imply a significant inverse association between public spending on health and pandemic influenza mortality. In an attempt to interpret the estimated coefficient (-0.00028) for the per capita government expenditure on health, we observed that a rise of 100 international dollars was associated with a reduction in the pandemic influenza mortality rate by approximately 2.8%. However, further work needs to be done to unravel the mechanisms by which reduced government spending on health may have affected the 2009 pandemic influenza mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.