Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21587298›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2011

Using electronic health records to drive discovery in disease genomics.

Isaac S Kohane

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 183 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
183citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

183 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluating Large Language Models in Extracting Cognitive Exam Dates and Scores.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Optimal and Safe Estimation for High-Dimensional Semi-Supervised Learning.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Phenomics and Robust Multiomics Data for Cardiovascular Disease Subtyping.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2023
    Review
  16. Evaluating resources composing the PheMAP knowledge base to enhance high-throughput phenotyping.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Efficient Evaluation of Prediction Rules in Semi-Supervised Settings under Stratified Sampling.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

123 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Isaac S KohaneHarvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. isaac_kohane@harvard.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If genomic studies are to be a clinically relevant and timely reflection of the relationship between genetics and health status--whether for common or rare variants--cost-effective ways must be found to measure both the genetic variation and the phenotypic characteristics of large populations, including the comprehensive and up-to-date record of their medical treatment. The adoption of electronic health records, used by clinicians to document clinical care, is becoming widespread and recent studies demonstrate that they can be effectively employed for genetic studies using the informational and biological 'by-products' of health-care delivery while maintaining patient privacy.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsGenomicsAllelesData CollectionEthnicityGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetics, MedicalGenetic VariationGenomeHumansInformed ConsentMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedModels, GeneticPhenotypeResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID21587298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.