Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21586504›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2011

Malignant tumours of the small intestine: a review of histopathology, multidetector CT and MRI aspects.

M Anzidei, A Napoli, C Zini, M A Kirchin, C Catalano, R Passariello

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Small bowel adenocarcinoma: An overview.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Workup of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2020
    Review
  19. Adult multicentric burkitt lymphoma with bowel obstruction due to intussusception.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M AnzideiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. michele.anzidei@gmail.com
A Napoli
C Zini
M A Kirchin
C Catalano
R Passariello

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small bowel neoplasms, including adenocarcinoma, carcinoid tumour, lymphoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumours, represent a small percentage of gastrointestinal cancers, yet are among those with the poorest prognosis compared with other gastrointestinal malignancies. Unclear clinical scenarios and difficult radiological diagnosis often delay treatment with negative effects on patient survival. Recently, multidetector CT (MDCT) and MRI have been introduced as feasible and accurate diagnostic techniques for the identification and staging of small bowel neoplasms. These techniques are gradually replacing conventional barium radiography as the tool of choice. However, the inherent technical and physiological challenges of small bowel imaging require a familiarity with patient preparation and scan protocols. Adequate knowledge of the histopathology and natural evolution of small bowel neoplasms is also important for differential diagnosis. The aim of this article is to review MDCT and MRI protocols for the evaluation of small bowel tumours and to provide a concise yet comprehensive guide to the most relevant imaging features relative to histopathology.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoid TumorClinical ProtocolsContrast MediaFemaleHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsIntestine, SmallLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrognosisTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID21586504
PMCPMC3473441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.