Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21586386›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2011

Computer-assisted update of a consumer health vocabulary through mining of social network data.

Kristina M Doing-Harris, Qing Zeng-Treitler

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. A survey of automated methods for biomedical text simplification.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. When synonyms are not enough: Optimal parenthetical insertion for text simplification.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Leveraging cues from person-generated health data for peer matching in online communities.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristina M Doing-HarrisDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. kristina.doing-harris@utah.edu
Qing Zeng-Treitler

Funding

Vocabulary Support for Consumer Health InformaticsR01LM007222 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ZENG, QING · 2002 to 2010
$1.9M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM007222NLM NIH HHS R01 LM07222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsumer health vocabularies (CHVs) have been developed to aid consumer health informatics applications. This purpose is best served if the vocabulary evolves with consumers' language.

objectiveOur objective was to create a computer assisted update (CAU) system that works with live corpora to identify new candidate terms for inclusion in the open access and collaborative (OAC) CHV.

methodsThe CAU system consisted of three main parts: a Web crawler and an HTML parser, a candidate term filter that utilizes natural language processing tools including term recognition methods, and a human review interface. In evaluation, the CAU system was applied to the health-related social network website PatientsLikeMe.com. The system's utility was assessed by comparing the candidate term list it generated to a list of valid terms hand extracted from the text of the crawled webpages.

resultsThe CAU system identified 88,994 unique terms 1- to 7-grams ("n-grams" are n consecutive words within a sentence) in 300 crawled PatientsLikeMe.com webpages. The manual review of the crawled webpages identified 651 valid terms not yet included in the OAC CHV or the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Metathesaurus, a collection of vocabularies amalgamated to form an ontology of medical terms, (ie, 1 valid term per 136.7 candidate n-grams). The term filter selected 774 candidate terms, of which 237 were valid terms, that is, 1 valid term among every 3 or 4 candidates reviewed.

conclusionThe CAU system is effective for generating a list of candidate terms for human review during CHV development.

Indexed as

ComputersConsumer Health InformationData MiningSocial SupportVocabularyBiomedical ResearchHumansNatural Language ProcessingVocabulary, Controlled

Identifiers

PMID21586386
PMCPMC3221384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.