Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21586318›Full record

ReviewHearing research2011

Synaptic short-term plasticity in auditory cortical circuits.

Alex D Reyes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hearing research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interactions between long- and short-term synaptic plasticity transform temporal neural representations into spatial.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Short-term depression and transient memory in sensory cortex.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cell-specific activity-dependent fractionation of layer 2/3→5B excitatory signaling in mouse auditory cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alex D ReyesCenter for Neural Science, New York University, NY 10003, United States. reyes@cns.nyu.edu

Funding

Segregation of Auditory Signals in CortexR01DC005787 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI REYES, ALEX D · 2003 to 2013
$2.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC005787-01A1NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The auditory system must be able to adapt to changing acoustic environment and still maintain accurate representation of signals. Mechanistically, this is a difficult task because the responsiveness of a large heterogeneous population of interconnected neurons must be adjusted properly and precisely. Synaptic short-term plasticity (STP) is widely regarded as a viable mechanism for adaptive processes. Although the cellular mechanism for STP is well characterized, the overall effect on information processing at the network level is poorly understood. The main challenge is that there are many cell types in auditory cortex, each of which exhibit different forms and degrees of STP. In this article, I will review the basic properties of STP in auditory cortical circuits and discuss the possible impact on signal processing.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysHumansModels, BiologicalNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsNeurotransmitter AgentsNorepinephrineNormal DistributionPyramidal CellsSynapsesNeurotransmitter AgentsNorepinephrine

Identifiers

PMID21586318
PMCPMC3172364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.