Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21586317›Full record

ReviewHearing research2011

Short-term plasticity and auditory processing in the ventral cochlear nucleus of normal and hearing-impaired animals.

Yong Wang, Heather O'Donohue, Paul Manis

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hearing research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. RIM-Binding Protein 2 Organizes CaThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multisensory Integration Enhances Temporal Coding in Ventral Cochlear Nucleus Bushy Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mechanisms of noise robust representation of speech in primary auditory cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yong WangDivision of Otolaryngology and Neuroscience Program, 3C120 School of Medicine, 30 North, 1900 East, Salt Lake City, University of Utah, UT 84132, USA. yong.wang@hsc.utah.edu
Heather O'Donohue
Paul Manis
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of North Carolina Health Care · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

CELLULAR MECHANISMS OF AUDITORY INFORMATION PROCESSINGR01DC004551 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MANIS, PAUL B · 2000 to 2018
$5.9M
Effect of Noise Induced Hearing Loss on AVCN Principal NeuronsR03DC008190 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WANG, YONG · 2006 to 2008
$217k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004551NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC004551NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC008190NIDCD NIH HHS R03DC008190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamics of synaptic transmission between neurons plays a major role in neural information processing. In the cochlear nucleus, auditory nerve synapses have a relatively high release probability and show pronounced synaptic depression that, in conjunction with the variability of interspike intervals, shapes the information transmitted to the postsynaptic cells. Cellular mechanisms have been best analyzed at the endbulb synapses, revealing that the recent history of presynaptic activity plays a complex, non-linear, role in regulating release. Emerging evidence suggests that the dynamics of synaptic function differs according to the target neuron within the cochlear nucleus. One consequence of hearing loss is changes in evoked release at surviving auditory nerve synapses, and in some situations spontaneous release is greatly enhanced. In contrast, even with cochlear ablation, postsynaptic excitability is less affected. The existing evidence suggests that different modes of hearing loss can result in different dynamic patterns of synaptic transmission between the auditory nerve and postsynaptic neurons. These changes in dynamics in turn will affect the efficacy with which different kinds of information about the acoustic environment can be processed by the parallel pathways in the cochlear nucleus.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory PathwaysCalciumCalcium ChannelsCochleaCochlear Nucleusgamma-Aminobutyric AcidHearing LossHumansMiceMice, TransgenicModels, BiologicalNeuronal PlasticitySynapsesSynaptic TransmissionCalciumCalcium Channelsgamma-Aminobutyric Acid

Identifiers

PMID21586317
PMCPMC3280686
OpenAlexW1993778241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.