Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21585244›Full record

SynthesisStem cells and development2012

Female sex bias in human embryonic stem cell lines.

Dalit Ben-Yosef, Ami Amit, Mira Malcov, Tsvia Frumkin, Ahmi Ben-Yehudah, Ido Eldar, Nava Mey-Raz, Foad Azem, Gheona Altarescu, Paul Renbaum and 6 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Stem cells and development, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Homosexuality via canalized sexual development: a testing protocol for a new epigenetic model.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2013
    Article
  12. Solving the "X" in embryos and stem cells.Stem cells and development · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Dalit Ben-YosefDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ami Amit
Mira Malcov
Tsvia Frumkin
Ahmi Ben-Yehudah
Ido Eldar
Nava Mey-Raz
Foad Azem
Gheona Altarescu
Paul Renbaum
Rachel Beeri
Irit Varshaver
Talia Eldar-Geva
Silvina Epsztejn-Litman
Ephrat Levy-Lahad
Rachel Eiges

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The factors limiting the rather inefficient derivation of human embryonic stem cells (HESCs) are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to analyze the sex ratio in our 42 preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)-HESC lines, in an attempt to verify its affect on the establishment of HESC lines. The ratio between male and female PGD-derived cell lines was compared. We found a significant increase in female cell lines (76%). This finding was further confirmed by a meta-analysis for combining the results of all PGD-derived HESC lines published to date (148) and all normal karyotyped HESC lines derived from spare in vitro fertilization embryos worldwide (397). Further, gender determination of embryos demonstrated that this difference originates from the actual derivation process rather than from unequal representation of male and female embryos. It can therefore be concluded that the clear-cut tendency for female preponderance is attributed to suboptimal culture conditions rather than from a true gender imbalance in embryos used for derivation of HESC lines. We propose a mechanism in which aberrant X chromosome inactivation and/or overexpression of critical metabolic X-linked genes might explain this sex dimorphism.

Indexed as

Sex RatioBiomarkersCell LineChromosomes, HumanEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryonic Stem CellsFemaleGenome, HumanHumansKaryotypeMalePreimplantation DiagnosisX Chromosome InactivationBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID21585244
PMCPMC3272241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.