ReviewDrug safety2011
A benefit-risk assessment of dabigatran in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic surgery.
Review in Drug safety, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis of HHT120, a Novel Direct Thrombin Inhibitor, in Healthy Participants from a Phase I Clinical Trial.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
- Association of ABCB1 gene polymorphisms rs1128503, rs2032582, rs4148738 with anemia in patients receiving dabigatran after total knee arthroplasty.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2024Article
- The application of inferior vena cava filters in orthopaedics and current research advances.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Pharmacogenomics of Novel Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Newly Identified Genes and Genetic Variants.Journal of personalized medicine · 2019Review
- Direct oral anticoagulants for extended-duration thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medically ill patients: are we there yet?Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2017Review
- Anticoagulation therapy in animal research.Lab animal · 2016Article
- [Rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban: new anticoagulants in operative urology].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2014Article
- Practical issues, limitations, and periprocedural management of the NOAC's.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2013Review
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dabigatran etexilate is a novel orally administered anticoagulant that exerts its action through reversible direct thrombin inhibition. This anticoagulant has been approved for prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) after hip or knee arthroplasty, and in a few countries also for atrial fibrillation. This article reviews the efficacy and safety of dabigatran for the prophylaxis of VTE-indication compared with data on the most common current regimen with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), specifically enoxaparin. Alternative prophylactic agents are also discussed. The results regarding efficacy and safety are very similar for dabigatran and LMWH. Bleeding and gastrointestinal reactions are the most frequently reported adverse events with a comparable incidence on LMWH and are probably the result of surgery and anaesthaesia. No adverse event that is specific for dabigatran has been observed in these studies, although dyspepsia has been reported as significantly more frequent than warfarin in long-term studies on other indications. The fact that dabigatran has no antidote has so far not been a problem in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. The use of the lower dose of dabigatran (150 mg) appears beneficial to reduce the risk of bleeding in patients over 75 years of age and in those with moderate renal impairment to avoid drug accumulation. The convenience of oral administration is an advantage for dabigatran over LMWH, particularly for extended prophylaxis up to 1 month after surgery. In conclusion, the benefit-risk profile of dabigatran is favourable for use as prophylaxis against VTE after major orthopaedic surgery with its convenient oral administration without need for laboratory monitoring and a low risk of bleeding or other adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.