ArticleDer Orthopade2011
[Periprosthetic infections following total hip replacement with ESBL-forming bacteria: importance for clinical practice].
Article in Der Orthopade, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A biocompatible sol-gel derived titania coating for medical implants with antibacterial modification by copper integration.AMB Express · 2018Article
- [Infections of hip and knee endoprostheses. Spectrum of pathogens and the role of multiresistant bacteria].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016Article
- A model of implant-associated infection in the tibial metaphysis of rats.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2013Article
- Analysis of the release characteristics of cu-treated antimicrobial implant surfaces using atomic absorption spectrometry.Bioinorganic chemistry and applications · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implant infections remain feared and severe complications after total hip replacement. An even higher rate of periprosthetic infections can be observed after revision surgery in comparison to primary total hip replacement. An additional threat for patients with artificial joints arises from the fact that bacteria resistant to a multitude of antibiotics are encountered with increasing frequency in the hospital setting.Among these the enterobacteria producing extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) are the second most frequent group of multiresistant pathogens. ESBLs are enzymes which possess the ability to hydrolyse third and fourth generation cephalosporins resulting in a distinctive resistance against these antibiotics. Even though ESBLs were first described in the early 1980's and now represent pathogens of utmost importance in intensive care units, they have been hardly considered in orthopedic and trauma surgery.In the present manuscript we provide an overview of the epidemiology and diagnostics of ESBL-expressing bacteria and demonstrate the difficulties in managing implant-associated infections with resistant bacteria. Furthermore, we emphasize the importance of recognizing ESBL-positive bacteria as increasingly important pathogens which require special precautions and treatment. Clinical evaluations suggest that ESBLs in orthopedic and trauma surgery are not a rare phenomenon any more.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.